How Do I Create an Incoming QC Specification for Candle Wax Covering Appearance, Odour, Melting Behaviour, Hardness, Finished Appearance, Fragrance Compatibility and Burn Performance?
शेयर करना
What should a wax specification cover? Appearance, odour, melting behaviour, hardness, finished appearance, fragrance compatibility and burn performance, plus a header recording the supplier, grade, published statements and reference sample.
Where do the acceptance criteria come from? Mostly from comparison with a retained reference lot that you approved, plus any figures the supplier publishes. Any numeric tolerance you set is a suggested starting point to validate, not a standard.
Does every check happen every delivery? No. Quick screens happen every delivery; puck and finish checks happen per new lot or when flagged; full fragrance and burn checks happen on a trigger or on a schedule.
What a specification is, and is not
Most makers who have been buying wax for a while already have habits: they look at the colour, smell a melted sample, maybe pour a test candle. A specification writes those habits down in a form that removes judgement from the parts that should not depend on it. For each parameter it answers four questions. What exactly are we checking? How do we check it? What result passes? How often do we check?
It is not a supplier certificate, and it is not a promise from the supplier. It is your internal standard for accepting a delivery into production. That distinction matters because most wax suppliers, CSI among them, do not publish lot-by-lot tolerances, colour specifications or certificates of analysis. A specification that demands figures the supplier never offered will either be ignored or will fail every delivery. A specification written against your own approved reference lot works with the information you actually have.
One page per wax grade is enough. If you use two grades, such as a container soy and a pillar soy, write two pages, because their criteria and burn checks differ.
The header: what you know before testing
The header records the context that makes the criteria meaningful. Keep it factual: only what the supplier states, and only what you have verified.
The seven parameters
The table below is a worked specification for CSI 468 in a container candle. The criteria and tolerances are suggested starting points to validate against your own records, not standards and not CSI policy.
| Parameter | Method | Acceptance criterion (suggested) | Tier |
|---|---|---|---|
| Appearance | 20 g beside reference on white paper, daylight | No visible difference in shade, form or dust; no foreign matter | A: every delivery |
| Odour | Equal melted samples, coded, compared blind by two people | Both judge it the same as reference; no sharp, rancid or burnt note | A: every delivery |
| Melting behaviour | Samples warmed side by side; verified thermometer | Fully liquid and setting within about 2°C of the reference reading | A: every delivery |
| Hardness | Equal pucks, 24 h in same room, blind press, cut and snap ranking | Not ranked firmer or softer than reference by both judges | B: every new lot |
| Finished appearance | Standard pucks and one unscented jar, held 7 days | Top smoothness, frosting and adhesion no worse than reference in blind ranking | B: every new lot |
| Fragrance compatibility | Reference formula with reference oil, cured to stated minimum | No sweating, separation or wet spots beyond reference; throw score within one point | C: on trigger or schedule |
| Burn performance | Paired candles vs reference: melt pool at 1, 2, 3 h; grams per hour; full burn | Pool and grams per hour within about 10% of reference; no soot, flare or overheating | C: on trigger or schedule |
Notice that every criterion refers back to the reference. That is deliberate. It means the specification stays valid even though you have no published tolerance to lean on, and it means a delivery is judged against the lot you know works in your product, not against a general idea of what soy wax should be like.
Writing criteria two people would apply the same way
A criterion fails if two careful people could read it differently. Looks fine is not a criterion; no visible difference in shade beside the reference on white paper in daylight is. Name the light, the background, the sample size and the comparison every time. For sensory checks, name the number of judges and require them to score before discussing.
Where you add a number, say where it came from. The 2°C and 10% figures in the example are starting points chosen to be loose enough to pass normal variation and tight enough to flag a real shift. After a year of records you will know whether they were right: if deliveries you later regretted all sat inside the band, tighten it; if good lots keep failing, loosen it in the next version.
Frequency tiers and a worked cost
Running every check on every delivery wastes time on deliveries that match. Tiering puts the cheap, fast checks first and saves the expensive ones for when they are needed. Tier A runs on every delivery and takes about half an hour. Tier B runs when a delivery is a new lot, or when Tier A flags a difference. Tier C runs when Tier B flags a difference, when you change anything in the formula, and on a schedule you choose, such as once a quarter.
Worked example: the Tier C check uses the reference formula of a 200 g candle in a clear salsa jar at 10% of total candle weight with Juicy Orange, whose page states soy use at 8–10%. Each candle takes 20 g of oil and 180 g of wax. Two reference candles and two new-lot candles make one Tier C run.
| Item | Working | Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Juicy Orange oil | 4 × 20 g = 80 g; ₹749.00 ÷ 100 g = ₹7.49 per g; 80 × ₹7.49 | ₹599.20 |
| CSI 468 wax | 4 × 180 g = 720 g; ₹6,370.00 ÷ 10,000 g = ₹0.637 per g; 720 × ₹0.637 | ₹458.64 |
| Clear salsa jars | ₹2,950.00 ÷ 100 = ₹29.50 each; 4 × ₹29.50 | ₹118.00 |
| Eco Thin (C1) wicks | 4 × ₹5.90 | ₹23.60 |
| One Tier C run | ₹599.20 + ₹458.64 + ₹118.00 + ₹23.60 | ₹1,199.44 |
| Quarterly schedule for a year | 4 × ₹1,199.44 | ₹4,797.76 |
Set that yearly figure against one 25 kg delivery of CSI 468, which costs 2 × ₹6,370.00 + ₹3,185.00 = ₹15,925.00 before any oil or jars. The scheduled checks cost less than a third of a single delivery's wax, and they are the only part of the specification that tells you how the wax behaves in a burning candle.
Decision rules and keeping the document alive
End the specification with the rules that turn results into a status. A simple set: accept when all checks at the required tier pass; conditional release when a difference is confirmed but a recorded, lot-specific adjustment passes its own burn check; quarantine while any required check is incomplete or a supplier reply is pending; reject when a difference is confirmed, repeated and cannot be accommodated. Rejection applies whoever supplied the wax, including us.
A specification is only as good as its last revision. Review it whenever a problem reaches production that it should have caught, whenever you change grade, supplier or reference formula, and at a fixed interval you choose. Record each change with a version number, so a delivery from last spring can be judged against the version that applied then.
Where this page fits
CSI already has guides that cover parts of this question. This page covers the goods-in check for the question above; these go deeper on the rest:
Three things to buy for this job
| Option | Price | Status on the September 2026 pull |
|---|---|---|
| 500 g | ₹325.00 | In stock |
| 1 kg | ₹650.00 | In stock |
| 5 kg | ₹3,185.00 | In stock |
| 10 kg | ₹6,370.00 | In stock |
| Option | Price | Status on the September 2026 pull |
|---|---|---|
| Pen thermometer | ₹354.00 | In stock |
| Option | Price | Status on the September 2026 pull |
|---|---|---|
| 15 g | ₹126.00 | In stock |
| 50 g | ₹379.00 | In stock |
| 100 g | ₹749.00 | In stock |
| 500 g | ₹3,749.00 | In stock |
| 1 kg | ₹7,499.00 | In stock |
CANDLEMAKINGSUPPLIESINDIA supplies raw materials and production equipment, not finished candles. This guide separates general quality-control practice from what CSI's own product pages state, says plainly what CSI does not publish (lot numbers, certificates of analysis, tolerances), and labels every sample size, tolerance or retained quantity as a starting point for your own validation.
Prices are live CSI prices from September 2026; product pages are authoritative. Where a spec is not published — such as a lot number, a jar's internal diameter or a wick's burn rate — this guide says so rather than filling the gap.
For bulk quotes, questions about a specific delivery, GST invoicing, IFRA and MSDS documents, message us on WhatsApp at +91 7397976926.
Frequently asked questions
- I Buy Candle Raw Materials in Bulk and Cannot Afford to Discover Quality Differences After Production — What Incoming Checks Should I Perform Before Releasing Materials for Use?
- I Bought 25 Kg of Soy Wax and This Batch Looks More Yellow Than the Previous One — Should I Test It Before Making 500 Candles?
- My New Soy Wax Batch Has a Slightly Different Smell From the Last Batch — Is That Normal or Should I Stop Production Until I Test It?
- My New Soy Wax Feels Softer Than the Previous Bag From the Same Supplier — How Do I Check Whether Its Candle Performance Has Changed?
- I Bought the Same Soy Wax Again but the Flakes Look Slightly Different in Size and Texture — Does That Necessarily Mean the Wax Itself Is Different?
- My New Soy Wax Batch Melts Differently From the Previous One Even Though the Product Name Is Identical — What Should I Compare Before Using It Commercially?
- My New 25 Kg Wax Bag Takes Longer to Melt Than the Previous Batch — Could Normal Batch Variation Affect Processing Behaviour?
- My New Wax Batch Seems to Solidify Faster After Pouring — Should I Repeat My Pouring-Temperature and Cooling Tests Before Scaling Production?
- My New Soy Wax Produces More Frosting Than the Last Batch With the Same Formula — How Do I Determine Whether the Raw Material Changed?
- How to Tell If Soy Wax Is Good Quality
- Why Every New Wax × Wick × Fragrance Combination Needs Burn Testing
Customer reviews: The reviews at the top are genuine, published Judge.me reviews — Ashwini (5★, not recorded as verified); Rahul Singh (5★, verified); Tina Raha (4★, verified); LJ (5★, not recorded as verified); Sraddha (5★, verified); Urvashi Patel (4★, verified). Names, ratings, dates and products as recorded by Judge.me.
Product facts (September 2026, CSI live store): Premium Coconut Soy Wax CSI 468 (flakes): 500 g ₹325.00, 1 kg ₹650.00, 5 kg ₹3,185.00, 10 kg ₹6,370.00 — coconut-soy blend · stated melt point 50–53°C, pour 58–60°C · stated fragrance load up to 13% · stated shelf life 60 months. Pen Thermometer: Pen thermometer ₹354.00 — range and accuracy not published. Juicy Orange Fragrance Oil: 15 g ₹126.00, 50 g ₹379.00, 100 g ₹749.00, 500 g ₹3,749.00, 1 kg ₹7,499.00 — soy 8–10%, cure 48–72 h · page: low discolouration risk (light musk and amber base, not vanilla-heavy).
Assumptions: Fragrance load is a percentage of total candle weight (200 g = 184 g wax + 16 g oil at 8%). CSI product pages do not publish lot numbers, certificates of analysis, tolerances, jar internal diameters, wick dimensions or mould hardness; where this guide needs them, it tells you to measure or ask. Sample sizes, tolerances, retained quantities, test lengths and acceptance rules are suggested starting points to validate, not standards or CSI policy. Hypothetical supplier prices are CSI prices adjusted by the stated percentage and labelled as such. Worked examples are illustrations. Prices and availability change — product pages are authoritative.