My Smaller Wick Fixes Soot but Reduces the Melt Pool Slightly — How Do I Determine Whether the New Performance Is Still Commercially Acceptable?
शेयर करना
Eco C1 ₹5.90 a wick (20-pack ₹118.00) Eco C2 ₹9.44 a wick at every pack Weighing Scale ₹354.00
Soot fixed · pool slightly smaller
Approve the smaller wick on written pool criteria and five replicate candles, not on burn one.
★★★★☆
"Good quality .... if possible delivery date would be try little bit quick please"
Subhankar RoyVerified buyer · Sep 2024
Eco Candle Wicks
★★★★☆
"Quality of the wick is good for jar candles, team can work on the pricing and delivery timelines."
Monika DeepVerified buyer · Oct 2025
Eco Candle Wicks
★★★★★
"Quality wick, works very well"
AshwiniSep 2025
Eco Candle Wicks
★★★★★
"Soy wax quality is the best, which ever products ordered were properly packed and delivered as early as possible, timely response to the inquiries. Good service"
Jaya SawlaniVerified buyer · Nov 2025
Luxury Soy Wax CSI 464 (Flakes Form) For Container Candles
★★★★★
"I love all the products...I received it without any damages...love to reorder again❤️"
Kaushiki SatarkarVerified buyer · Apr 2025
Luxury Soy Wax Chunks for Jar / Container Candles
★★★★★
"One of the best wax for container Candles. Easy to work with, especially if you are a beginner."
ThenirvaofficialVerified buyer · Nov 2025
Luxury Soy Wax CSI 464 (Flakes Form) For Container Candles
★★★★☆
"Good quality .... if possible delivery date would be try little bit quick please"
Subhankar RoyVerified buyer · Sep 2024
Eco Candle Wicks
★★★★☆
"Quality of the wick is good for jar candles, team can work on the pricing and delivery timelines."
Monika DeepVerified buyer · Oct 2025
Eco Candle Wicks
★★★★★
"Quality wick, works very well"
AshwiniSep 2025
Eco Candle Wicks
★★★★★
"Soy wax quality is the best, which ever products ordered were properly packed and delivered as early as possible, timely response to the inquiries. Good service"
Jaya SawlaniVerified buyer · Nov 2025
Luxury Soy Wax CSI 464 (Flakes Form) For Container Candles
★★★★★
"I love all the products...I received it without any damages...love to reorder again❤️"
Kaushiki SatarkarVerified buyer · Apr 2025
Luxury Soy Wax Chunks for Jar / Container Candles
★★★★★
"One of the best wax for container Candles. Easy to work with, especially if you are a beginner."
ThenirvaofficialVerified buyer · Nov 2025
Luxury Soy Wax CSI 464 (Flakes Form) For Container Candles
Reviews collected and published through Judge.me on candlemakingsuppliesindia.store. They are general reviews of the products named on each card, not assessments of the advice set out below. Wording is unedited.
✓ Prices verified 7 October 2026, stock checked per pack ✓ GST invoice; MSDS and IFRA documentation on request ✓ Raw materials only — CSI does not sell finished candles
CSI Wick Decisions · Smaller Pool
A pool 88% as wide as the jar covers only 77.4% of its surface. Judge the smaller wick on written criteria, on five candles burned the way customers burn, and weigh what it leaves behind.
77.4%
of the pool area on burn 1 when the pool is 88% of the width, 7.5 cm inside jar · worked example
Quick answers — read this first
My smaller wick fixed the soot, but the melt pool is a bit smaller. Is that commercially acceptable? It is if it passes three written criteria on replicate candles: the pool reaches the glass by burn 2–3 and stays there; there is no tunnel at full life; and wax left on the walls at the end (hang-up) is within your limit, measured by weight. The combustion gate (no soot, flame in band) still applies.How small is "slightly smaller"? Measure area, not width. In the worked 7.5 cm jar, a pool 88% as wide as the jar is only 77.4% of its surface. That is fine on burn 1 if it reaches the glass by burn 2–3; it isn't fine if it never does.
How do I test it? Five C1 candles: three in 4-hour sessions and two in 2-hour sessions, the way many customers actually burn. Log the pool at hour 4 of every session, weigh each spent candle, and apply your rule.
What does it cost? A C1 20-pack and 1 kg of CSI 464: ₹625.40, with your own oil and jars.
The short answer
Gate first: the smaller wick must still pass on soot, flame, pool depth and glass. It does here; that's why you changed.
Then three pool criteria (in-house, labelled): edge by burn 2–3 and held; no tunnel at full life; hang-up within your limit (7.5 g, 5% of fill, in the worked example).
Replicates: three standard candles plus two short-session candles, full life, top, middle and bottom judged separately.
Decision: pass all: approve. Fail only under short burns: approve with first-burn advice, or reconsider. Fail under 4-hour burns: not acceptable.
In this guide
- Straight answer: acceptable if it passes three written criteria
- Your situation, made precise
- Why "slightly smaller" is bigger than it looks
- Why the pool is smaller: causes, ranked
- The acceptance criteria, written down
- The replicate test: five candles, two burn habits
- The decision, and the step to production
- What to buy, and what to skip
- Frequently asked questions
Top: the worked example's pool on the smaller wick at the end of three 4-hour burns, drawn to scale in a 7.5 cm (inside) jar. A pool 88% as wide as the jar covers only 77.4% of its area on burn 1, 92.2% on burn 2, and reaches the glass on burn 3, inside an "edge by burn 2–3" criterion. Bottom: wax left on the walls at the end of life, by weight, for five replicate candles against a written 7.5 g limit. The 4-hour candles pass; the 2-hour candles don't, which is a label decision, not a wick verdict on its own. Values are illustrative, not CSI data.
Wicks · C1 ₹5.90 · C2 ₹9.44 a wick at every pack
Eco Candle Wicks: five replicate C1 candles from one 20-pack (₹118.00)
Tool · ₹354.00
Candle Making Weighing Scale: hang-up is a weight, not an impression
WhatsApp +91 7397976926
C2 soots, C1 leaves a ledge? Ask us. We'll say plainly that we stock nothing between them, and what we'd test.
Straight answer
My smaller wick fixes soot but reduces the melt pool slightly. How do I determine whether the new performance is still commercially acceptable?
Decide it on written criteria and replicate candles, not on how the first burn looks. Keep the gate: the smaller wick has fixed the soot; it must also keep the flame in your band and the glass within your limit. Then judge the pool on three criteria, set before you light anything (ours, labelled): the pool reaches the glass by the end of burn 2 or 3 in 4-hour sessions and stays there in every later session; there is no tunnel at full life (no unmelted ring thicker than your limit in the middle or bottom thirds); and the wax left on the walls when the flame stops, measured by weight above your designed floor, is within your limit. Test the way customers burn: three candles in 4-hour sessions and two in 2-hour sessions, all to the end. Decide by the result: if all five pass, the smaller pool is acceptable. If only the short-session candles fail, it's acceptable with clear first-burn advice, which is a commercial choice you make knowingly. If the 4-hour candles fail, it isn't acceptable, and CSI has no half-size between C1 and C2 to fix it, so the next step is a pair of smaller wicks or the formula.
One line: the smaller pool is acceptable if, on five replicate candles, it reaches the glass by burn 2–3, never tunnels, and leaves no more wax on the walls than your written limit.
The replicate test, priced: one Eco C1 20-pack (₹118.00) wicks all five candles with 15 spare; 1 kg of Luxury Soy Wax CSI 464 (₹507.40) pours them. ₹625.40 with your own oil and jars; ₹979.40 if you also need the weighing scale. In stock on 7 October 2026.
Eco C1 20-pack — ₹118.00
Your situation, made precise
You've traded soot for a thin ring of wax. Now you need to know whether customers will see it.
The worked example, labelled: a 150 g candle at 8% (12 g of fragrance and 138 g of wax, load as a percentage of total weight) in your own jar, measured at 7.5 cm inside. On Eco C2 it reached the glass early and sooted by hour three. On Eco C1 it burns cleanly, but at the end of the first 4-hour burn the pool is 6.6 cm across, leaving about 4.5 mm of solid wax at the glass all round; on burn 2 it reaches 7.2 cm. You're asking whether that is a defect or a fair price for a clean flame.
This post owns the acceptance criteria, the replicate test and the decision. How a candidate that tunnels slightly compares with one that mushrooms slightly is 6959; the matching question about scent strength is 6989. The published post on the same trade-off after a supplier change is a replacement wick that burns cleaner with a slightly smaller pool; here the change is one rung down within CSI's own range.
Safety first, plainly: a smaller wick that tunnels is a quality problem; a wick that soots or runs the glass hot is a safety problem, and you were right to fix that first. Keep checking it as the candle burns down: stop any session where the flame smokes continuously, approaches the glass or burns near the base. Never judge glass heat by touch; use your own non-contact thermometer (CSI lists none). No wick makes a candle "soot-free".
Why "slightly smaller" is bigger than it looks
You see the width. The candle works with the area.
A melt pool is a circle, and circles punish small shortfalls. The surface that releases fragrance and the wax the wick is using both scale with area, π × r², on the inside diameter. In the worked example the glass is 7.5 cm inside, so the full pool is 44.18 cm². A burn-1 pool of 6.6 cm is 88% of the width but 34.21 cm², only 77.4% of the area. At 7.2 cm on burn 2 it's 40.72 cm², 92.2%.
Width versus area · 7.5 cm inside jar, Eco C1, end of a 4-hour session
Pool area = π × r² on the inside diameter · ring = unmelted wax per side · illustrative pool sizes, not CSI data
| Burn | Pool across | Share of width | Pool area | Share of area | Ring per side |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.6 cm | 88% | 34.21 cm² | 77.4% | 4.5 mm |
| 2 | 7.2 cm | 96% | 40.72 cm² | 92.2% | 1.5 mm |
| 3 | 7.5 cm | 100% | 44.18 cm² | 100% | none |
That's why "it's only a few millimetres" is the wrong frame, and why the criterion is about when the pool reaches the glass and whether it stays there, not how close it gets. A common rule of thumb is about one hour of burning per 2.5 cm of diameter for a full pool (about 3.0 hours for this jar; very rough). A wick that's a little under that pace on burn 1 but reaches the glass by burn 2–3 usually leaves no lasting ring; one that never quite gets there builds a wall of wax that the next burns can't reach, which is tunnelling. The early-ring question in published form: accepting a thin ring during early burns and tunnels on burn 1 but catches up later.
Why the pool is smaller: causes, ranked
Some of the shortfall is the wick doing its job. Some of it is how the candle was burned.
The ranking is our judgement for "smaller wick, clean flame, pool short of the glass on early burns". Signs are common observations, not CSI burn data.
Cause ranking · smaller pool on the smaller wick
Formulation and making first, then burning habits · ₹ from CSI live pricing, 7 October 2026
| Cause | What you'd see | Discriminating test | Fix | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Less wick power (making: wick, expected) | Even ring all round on burn 1, shrinking on burn 2, gone by 3; flame calm, no soot | Pool width at hour 4 of burns 1–3 on three candles | Accept if it meets the criteria; otherwise a C1 pair or the formula | ₹118.00 (C1 20-pack) |
| 2. Short sessions (burning: habit) | A ring that persists when sessions are 1–2 hours, absent at 4 hours | Two candles in 2-hour sessions beside 4-hour ones | First-burn advice on the label, or a stronger configuration | Stickers from ₹0.83 each |
| 3. Off-centre or leaning wick (making: production) | Ring thick on one side, pool touching the glass on the other | Tab position in the spent jar | Centre and hold while setting | ₹118.00 for five holders |
| 4. Draught or a cold room (burning: environment) | One-sided pool on fan days; slower pools in a cold room (North Indian winters) | Still air, room temperature logged | Test conditions; care advice | Nothing |
| 5. Heavier oil or higher load (making: formula) | The same wick reaches the glass in a lighter oil | Same wick, lighter oil, side by side | Per-fragrance wick spec (6987) | Your own oil |
Cause 1 is the expected trade: a smaller wick puts less heat into the wax, which is how it stopped sooting. The question isn't whether the pool is smaller (it will be) but whether it is enough. Cause 2 is the commercial one, because customers' burn habits aren't yours: many people light a candle for an hour or two. A wick that only works in 4-hour sessions is a wick whose label has to say so. The published post on a wick that takes nearly four hours to reach the edge but otherwise burns cleanly is is it necessarily too small?.
The acceptance criteria, written down
Write the limits before the first burn. Otherwise the candle will set them for you.
Acceptance criteria for a smaller pool · our in-house protocol, labelled
Every limit is yours to set; the examples are starting points for a 150 g candle · a fail in any candle fails the wick · not an industry standard
| Criterion | How measured | Example limit | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gate: combustion | Flame ruler, soot card, mushroom photo, glass with your own thermometer | Flame in your band (2.5–5 cm is a common rule of thumb); no smoke; glass within your limit | The reason for the change; must still hold to the bottom |
| 1. Edge by burn 2–3 | Pool width at hour 4, photo from above, inside diameter | Pool at the glass all round by the end of burn 3 (4-hour sessions), and at every later session | A ring that closes early doesn't become a tunnel |
| 2. No tunnel at full life | Ring width at the glass in the middle and bottom thirds | No ring wider than about 2 mm after burn 3 (your figure) | A ring that grows as the wax drops is the start of a tunnel |
| 3. Hang-up within limit | Spent candle weight − empty jar weight − designed floor | No more than 7.5 g (5% of a 150 g fill) per candle | Wax left on the walls is wax the customer paid for and couldn't burn |
| 4. Pool depth | Skewer midway, hour 4 | Inside your limit (about 1–1.5 cm is a common rule of thumb) | Confirms the smaller wick isn't still too strong lower down |
| 5. Short-burn behaviour | Two candles in 2-hour sessions, same measures | Recorded; decides the label, not the wick | How many customers will actually burn it |
Hang-up is the criterion most makers skip, and it's the one customers notice at the end: a jar with a thick collar of wax looks like a candle that gave up. Measuring it by weight makes it a number. Worked example, labelled: the designed floor in this jar is about 18 g (about 1 cm; how much floor to leave is 6970), so a spent candle with 23.5 g of wax left has 5.5 g of hang-up. Weigh each empty jar before you pour; that's the step people forget. The series' standard for an acceptable flame, as opposed to an impressive one, is 6919.
Burn time is part of "commercially acceptable" too
A smaller wick commonly burns slower, so the same candle lasts longer. Worked example, labelled (weigh your own): 132 g burnable above the floor at 7.5 g an hour on C2 is about 17.6 hours; at 6.0 g an hour on C1, about 22.0 hours. If you print a burn time, it must come from your own full-life weights on the approved wick, not from the old wick and not from this example.The replicate test: five candles, two burn habits
Three candles tell you about the wick. Two more tell you about your customers.
1
Pour five candles on C1, weigh the jars firstWeigh and label each empty jar, then pour 150 g at 8% (60 g of oil and 690 g of wax in all) from one wax lot and one oil lot, within the wax page's range (CSI 464 states 80°C–90°C). Centre and hold every wick.
2
Write the criteria and cureThe table above with your own numbers, dated. Cure 3 days at least (several CSI oil pages state 48–72 hours for soy).
3
Candles 1–3: 4-hour sessionsTrimmed to 5–6 mm, still air. Pool width photographed at hour 4 of every session; flame, soot and depth logged at hours 1–4. About 6 sessions each at about 6 g an hour.
4
Candles 4–5: 2-hour sessionsThe same, in sessions of two hours: about 11 sessions each. This is the customer-realistic arm; it decides the label.
5
Weigh every spent candleWhen the flame stops, let it cool and weigh: residual wax minus floor = hang-up. Note the ring width in the middle and bottom thirds.
6
Apply the criteria, candle by candleAny fail in candles 1–3 fails the wick. Fails only in 4–5 go to the label decision below.
Illustrative results · five C1 candles, 150 g, 7.5 cm inside
Against the example limits above · illustrative, not CSI data
| Candle | Sessions | Edge by burn | Ring after burn 3 | Hang-up | Gate | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 h | 3 | none | 5.5 g | pass | pass |
| 2 | 4 h | 2 | none | 7.0 g | pass | pass |
| 3 | 4 h | 3 | none | 4.0 g | pass | pass |
| 4 | 2 h | never fully | about 2–3 mm, top third | 11.5 g | pass | fails hang-up |
| 5 | 2 h | 5 | about 1–2 mm | 9.0 g | pass | fails hang-up |
The approval rule (ours, labelled)
The smaller wick is approved when all three 4-hour candles pass the gate and all three pool criteria, in the top, middle and bottom thirds, to the end. The two short-session candles don't approve or reject the wick; they decide whether the product needs first-burn advice. One fail in any 4-hour candle fails the wick. An in-house protocol, not an industry standard; how many repeats in general is 6991.Test materials and ₹ · 5 candles × 150 g at 8%
CSI live pricing, 7 October 2026, in stock · own jars and oil · excludes labour, freight, packaging and GST
| Item | Need | Buy | ₹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wax: Luxury Soy Wax CSI 464 | 690 g | 1 kg (310 g spare) | ₹507.40 |
| Fragrance: your oil | 60 g | From stock | your own |
| Wicks: Eco C1 | 5 | C1 20-pack (15 spare) | ₹118.00 |
| Centring, if you have none | 5 holders | Wick Centering Device × 1 | ₹118.00 |
| Scale, if you have none | 1 | Candle Making Weighing Scale | ₹354.00 |
| Total, wicks and wax | C1 20 + 1 kg | ₹625.40 | |
| With the scale | + scale | ₹979.40 |
The decision, and the step to production
Three outcomes, three answers. Only one of them needs a different wick.
Decision table · smaller wick, smaller pool
After the five-candle test · our judgement · CSI wick range as listed on 7 October 2026
| Result | Verdict | What you do |
|---|---|---|
| All five pass | Acceptable | Approve C1; record the criteria and results; production by the month |
| 4-hour candles pass, 2-hour candles fail hang-up (the worked example) | Acceptable with first-burn advice | Approve C1 and put clear first-burn advice on the label ("burn until the melted wax reaches the edge", in your words); accept that short-burning customers will see a ring |
| Any 4-hour candle fails a pool criterion | Not acceptable | Not a wick to sell. Test a C1 pair, a lower load or a different oil; ask us for anything between C1 and C2 (we list nothing) |
| Any candle fails the gate | Not acceptable | Back to the soot diagnosis (6921) |
The middle row is a commercial decision, not a technical one, and it's yours. Some makers would rather the candle forgive short burns and will look for a configuration that does; others sell to customers who burn for an evening and accept a care instruction. What isn't acceptable is going back to the sooting wick to make the pool look better, or approving on one candle. The between-sizes options when C1 is genuinely too small are the hub's job (6981).
Don't do this. Don't judge the pool on burn 1; judge burns 2–3 and the end of life. Don't measure width and call it a few millimetres; work out the area. Don't skip weighing the empty jars, or hang-up becomes a guess. Don't go back up to the sooting wick because the pool looks small, and don't wick up blindly to Cotton Braided: its page positions it for jars "exceeding 8 cm". Don't let a care sticker carry a wick that fails the 4-hour test. And don't buy production wicks on one good candle.
Argued against our own interest: for most readers in this position the test confirms the smaller wick, and the only purchase is the 20-pack you test with. Because C1 and C2 cost the same per wick at every pack size, there's no saving in a big pack; and C1 happens to be ₹3.54 a candle cheaper than C2, a side effect, never the reason. If the first-burn advice route is yours, ask us what the Candle Care Stickers actually say before you buy a roll; you may be better off printing your own wording.
The step to production quantity
Only after the three 4-hour candles pass. Worked example, labelled: 350 candles a month on C1 plus 2% is 357 wicks: 3 × 100 + 50 + 20 = 370 for ₹2,183.00. A 500-pack is the same ₹5.90 a wick and ties up ₹767.00 more. Reorder point = daily use × your lead time + safety stock; CSI publishes no lead times, so ask on WhatsApp. Before a large order, read replicates before a 2,000-wick purchase.
Diwali is 8 November 2026, 32 days from 7 October 2026. The 2-hour candles take longest (about 11 sessions), so pour all five this week if festive stock depends on this wick. Send your approved C1 count on WhatsApp for stock, dispatch and a GST invoice.
WhatsApp a festive order
What to buy, and what to skip
Five items, chosen on page statements, price and stock on 7 October 2026. CSI publishes no pool, flame or soot data for any wick, so nothing is ranked on performance.
1
wick · pre-tabbed · the smaller wick under test
Eco Candle Wicks — Thin (C1) and Thick (C2)
The worked example moved from C2 (sooted) to C1 (clean, slightly smaller pool). C1 is the smallest sized, tabbed wick CSI lists and there is nothing between C1 and C2, so if C1 fails your pool criteria the answer isn't a half-size from us: it's a pair of smaller wicks, a formula change, or a question on WhatsApp. In the text we captured the page states no length, width or jar range, and claims "minimal soot or smoke" (the page's claim). C1 ₹5.90, C2 ₹9.44 a wick at every pack.
| Pack | Price | Per wick | Use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thin (C1) / 10 | ₹59.00 | ₹5.90 | Out of stock on 7 October 2026 |
| Thin (C1) / 20 | ₹118.00 | ₹5.90 | the replicate test: 5 used, 15 spare |
| Thin (C1) / 50 | ₹295.00 | ₹5.90 | production top-up |
| Thin (C1) / 100 | ₹590.00 | ₹5.90 | production, by the month |
| Thin (C1) / 500 | ₹2,950.00 | ₹5.90 | same per wick |
| Thin (C1) / 1,000 | ₹5,900.00 | ₹5.90 | same per wick |
| Thick (C2) / 10 | ₹94.40 | ₹9.44 | same per wick |
| Thick (C2) / 20 | ₹188.80 | ₹9.44 | same per wick |
| Thick (C2) / 50 | ₹472.00 | ₹9.44 | same per wick |
| Thick (C2) / 100 | ₹944.00 | ₹9.44 | same per wick |
| Thick (C2) / 500 | ₹4,720.00 | ₹9.44 | same per wick |
| Thick (C2) / 1,000 | ₹9,440.00 | ₹9.44 | same per wick |
Five replicate candles from one 20-pack: ₹118.00. Buy C1 20 — ₹118.00
2
tool · the hang-up measurement
Candle Making Weighing Scale
Hang-up is easiest to judge by weight: weigh each empty jar before pouring, weigh the spent candle when the flame stops, and the difference minus your designed floor is the wax the wick failed to use. The same scale gives grams per hour. The page says it "shows measurements in grams or ounces"; capacity and resolution aren't stated in the text we captured, so check it with a known weight. Argued against our own interest: any reliable scale you already own does this.
| Listing | Price | Stock | Use here |
|---|---|---|---|
| Candle Making Weighing Scale | ₹354.00 | In stock | residual wax, hang-up and grams per hour |
Weigh the jar empty and the candle spent. Buy — ₹354.00
3
accessory · centring · rules out a lopsided pool
Wick Centering Device (Pack of 5)
A pool that reaches the glass on one side and not the other is usually an off-centre or leaning wick, not a small one, and it will fail your pool criterion for the wrong reason. Wooden bars with one 4 mm hole ("Hole Dia 0,15" (4mm)"), for openings the page gives as "less than 4"" (about 10 cm): one pack holds all five test candles. Limitation: single wick only; if C1 fails and you move to a C1 pair, a multi-hole holder such as the Steel Wick Holder (page: "3-hole layout") states no hole spacing, so measure it.
| Pack | Price | Per holder | Use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pack of 5 | ₹118.00 | ₹23.60 | five test candles, one each |
₹23.60 a holder, reusable. Buy 5 — ₹118.00
4
packaging · customer guidance
Candle Care Stickers Roll
If your test shows the smaller wick needs a proper first burn, the instruction has to reach the customer. CSI lists a care-sticker roll in two sizes; in the text we captured the page doesn't state what is printed on the stickers, so ask us on WhatsApp before relying on it for first-burn advice, or print your own. Limitation: a sticker supports a candle that passes your 4-hour test; it can't rescue one that tunnels under normal burns.
| Pack | Price | Per sticker | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pack of 500 (1 inch) | ₹413.00 | ₹0.83 | if its printed wording suits you |
| Pack of 1000 (1.5 inch) | ₹699.00 | ₹0.70 | same; larger sticker |
₹0.83 a sticker on the 500 roll. Buy 500 — ₹413.00
5
wax · the test base
Luxury Soy Wax CSI 464 (flakes)
Five 150 g candles at 8% need 690 g of wax: one 1 kg pack (₹507.40), 310 g spare. The page states a pour temperature of 80°C–90°C and a fragrance load "up to 10%", a formulation limit. Pour the replicates from the same lot as production. Limitation: flat per gram from 1 kg to 10 kg; the bigger bags save nothing.
| Pack | Price | Per gram | Use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 g | ₹260.00 | ₹0.52 | not enough for five candles |
| 1 kg | ₹507.40 | ₹0.51 | five 150 g candles, 310 g spare |
| 5 kg | ₹2,537.00 | ₹0.51 | same per gram |
| 10 kg | ₹5,074.00 | ₹0.51 | production, after approval |
Test wax: ₹507.40. Buy 1 kg — ₹507.40
Skip for now: Cotton Braided (a rung above the wick that sooted); a second oil while the wick question is open; the care-sticker roll until you know its wording suits you; and any production wick pack before the three 4-hour candles pass.
The CSI principle
"Slightly smaller" is acceptable when it meets limits you wrote down, on candles burned the way customers burn them.
Edge by burn 2–3, no tunnel at full life, hang-up within your limit, gate intact. Five candles: ₹625.40.
"A clean flame with a thin ring on burn one is a wick doing its job. A ring that's still there at the bottom is not."
— CandleMakingSuppliesIndia
Why trust this guide
CandleMakingSuppliesIndia sells the wicks, wax and tools named here, not finished candles. This page still tells you that the test usually needs only a 20-pack, that any reliable scale will do, that our wick range has no step between C1 and C2, and to check our care stickers' wording before buying them.
Every CSI price was checked on the live store on 7 October 2026, with stock checked per pack: the Eco C1 10-pack is out of stock and is not offered. Page wording is quoted and attributed, including the Wick Centering Device's 4 mm hole, the Steel Wick Holder's "3-hole layout" and the Eco wick page's "minimal soot or smoke".
The 7.5 cm jar, pool sizes, the 18 g floor, the 5% hang-up limit, the 2 mm ring limit, the consumption rates, the illustrative results, 350 candles a month and a 2% allowance are labelled worked examples, illustrations or our judgement. For bulk pricing, GST invoicing, and MSDS and IFRA documentation on request, message us on WhatsApp at +91 7397976926.
Frequently asked questions
How many burns should it take for a candle to reach the edge of the jar?
A common rule of thumb is a full pool within about 3–4 hours on the first burn. If a cleaner, smaller wick gets there by burn 2–3 in 4-hour sessions and stays there, many makers accept it; one that never quite reaches the glass will tunnel.
Is a small ring of wax around the jar after the first burn a problem?
Not if it disappears by burn 2–3 and doesn't return lower down. Measure it on replicate candles and decide against a written limit.
How do I measure wax hang-up in a candle?
Weigh the empty jar before pouring and the spent candle when the flame stops. Residual wax minus your designed floor is hang-up; compare it with a limit you set, such as 5% of the fill.
Should I go back to a bigger wick if the melt pool is too small?
Not if the bigger wick sooted. Test the smaller one against written pool criteria first; if it genuinely fails in 4-hour burns, try a pair of smaller wicks or a formula change.
Do customers need to burn a candle for hours the first time?
Many care labels advise burning until the melted wax reaches the edge. Test two candles in 2-hour sessions to see what happens if they don't, and decide your label from that.
Does a smaller wick make a candle last longer?
Commonly, yes, because it burns less wax an hour. Any burn time you print must come from your own full-life weights on the approved wick.
Smaller wick, slightly smaller pool
Write the pool criteria, burn five replicate candles two ways, weigh what's left, then decide.
One Eco C1 20-pack and 1 kg of CSI 464 make the test: ₹625.40. If C1 fails in 4-hour burns and C2 soots, tell us on WhatsApp; we'll say plainly that we stock nothing between them, and what we'd test instead.
Shop Eco Candle Wicks C1 / C2 Check stock on WhatsApp
Continue the read — from failed wick to the right CSI wick
- My Current Wick Soots but the Next Size Down Tunnels — What Should I Test When Neither Wick Size Works Properly?
- How Do I Compare Wick Candidates When One Tunnels Slightly and Another Burns Edge-to-Edge but Mushrooms Heavily?
- My Corrected Wick Burns Cleanly but Produces Slightly Less Hot Throw — Should Safety and Combustion Quality Take Priority Over Maximum Fragrance Intensity?
- My New Wick Passed One Full Candle Test — How Many Repeat Burns Should I Perform Before Approving It for Production?
- I Have 2,000 Candles Planned — Should I Complete Multiple Replicate Burn Tests Before Purchasing 2,000 Production Wicks?
- My Candle Has a Very Tall Flame but the Melt Pool Still Does Not Reach the Glass — Why Might Simply Wicking Down Create Another Problem?
- How Much Wax Should Remain at the Bottom of a Container Candle Rather Than Trying to Burn Every Gram?
- How Do I Take a Candle from Large Flame / Soot / Mushrooming → Identify the Combustion Problem → Separate User Behaviour from Formulation Failure → Test Smaller or Alternative CSI Wicks → Complete Full-Life Burn Testing → Approve the Specification → Purchase Production Quantities?
Editorial standards & sources
About this guide: part of CSI's cluster on moving from a failed wick to the correct CSI wick and a bulk purchase (6981–7000). It covers judging whether a slightly smaller melt pool on a cleaner, smaller wick is commercially acceptable: width versus area, causes ranked, written acceptance criteria including hang-up by weight, a five-candle replicate test with a customer-realistic short-session arm, a decision table, a buy list and the production step.Customer reviews: The six reviews at the top of this page are genuine, published Judge.me reviews left by CSI customers on the product pages named on each card — Eco Candle Wicks, Luxury Soy Wax CSI 464 (Flakes Form) For Container Candles, Luxury Soy Wax Chunks for Jar / Container Candles. They are general product reviews, not assessments of the burn and wick advice on this page. Names, star ratings, dates and products are as recorded by Judge.me and wording is unedited. "Verified buyer" appears only on reviews Judge.me recorded as verified — Subhankar Roy, Monika Deep, Jaya Sawlani, Kaushiki Satarkar, Thenirvaofficial. The reviews from Ashwini are published but not recorded as verified, and carry no badge. Reviews below five stars are included as published, not filtered out.
Figures verified 7 October 2026, CSI live pricing: Eco Candle Wicks Thin (C1) 10 ₹59.00 (out of stock), 20 ₹118.00, 50 ₹295.00, 100 ₹590.00, 500 ₹2,950.00, 1,000 ₹5,900.00 (₹5.90 a wick); Thick (C2) 10 ₹94.40, 20 ₹188.80, 50 ₹472.00, 100 ₹944.00, 500 ₹4,720.00, 1,000 ₹9,440.00 (₹9.44 a wick); Candle Making Weighing Scale ₹354.00; Wick Centering Device (Pack of 5) ₹118.00 (₹23.60 each); Candle Care Stickers Roll Pack of 500 (1 inch) ₹413.00, Pack of 1000 (1.5 inch) ₹699.00; Luxury Soy Wax CSI 464 500 g ₹260.00, 1 kg ₹507.40, 5 kg ₹2,537.00, 10 kg ₹5,074.00. Every item priced here is in stock on 7 October 2026 except where marked. Per unit = price ÷ units, two decimals. CSI lists no non-contact thermometer.
Non-price figures: "fixes soot" and "reduces the melt pool slightly" are the reader's words (title). The 150 g candle at 8% (12 g oil + 138 g wax, total-weight basis) is the series default for a 7–7.5 cm jar, labelled; the 7.5 cm inside diameter is the reader's measured jar. Pool areas use π × r² on the inside diameter. Pool sizes, the 18 g floor, hang-up figures, the 5% and 2 mm limits, 7.5 and 6.0 g/h, 350 candles a month and a 2% allowance are labelled worked examples or illustrations. The flame band (2.5–5 cm), pool depth (about 1–1.5 cm), 5–6 mm trim, 1 cm floor and about one hour per 2.5 cm are rules of thumb. Wax ceiling as the page states (CSI 464 up to 10%), a formulation limit. Costs exclude labour, freight, packaging and GST. Diwali 8 November 2026 is a calendar fact.