I Moved One Wick Size Down Temporarily and the First Burn Looks Fine — Why Do I Still Need to Test the Candle Through Later Burns?

I Moved One Wick Size Down Temporarily and the First Burn Looks Fine — Why Do I Still Need to Test the Candle Through Later Burns?

 

Natural Soy Pearl Wax from ₹450.00 / kg Mango Coconut from ₹93.22 / 15 g Eco Thin C1 ₹59.00 / 10
CSI change-control guides · I changed my wick
You dropped one wick size and the first burn looks fine. Here is why the fifth burn is the one that counts.
★★★★☆
"Quality of the wick is good for jar candles, team can work on the pricing and delivery timelines."
Monika DeepVerified buyer · Oct 2025
Eco Candle Wicks
★★★★★
"Quality wick, works very well"
AshwiniSep 2025
Eco Candle Wicks
★★★★☆
"Good quality .... if possible delivery date would be try little bit quick please"
Subhankar RoyVerified buyer · Sep 2024
Eco Candle Wicks
★★★★★
"This needle is very helpful as it doesn't damage the mould and there is no leakage of wax while pouring.. I would definitely recommend this .."
LJAug 2024
Premium Candle Wicking Needle
★★★★★
"Good one"
Sneha TamangVerified buyer · Apr 2025
Premium Candle Wicking Needle
★★★★★
"This bamboo wick holder doesn't exert any pressure on the wicks… and it is a very useful product 👌🏻👌🏻.."
Lalitha JaganAug 2024
Bamboo Wick Holder
★★★★☆
"Quality of the wick is good for jar candles, team can work on the pricing and delivery timelines."
Monika DeepVerified buyer · Oct 2025
Eco Candle Wicks
★★★★★
"Quality wick, works very well"
AshwiniSep 2025
Eco Candle Wicks
★★★★☆
"Good quality .... if possible delivery date would be try little bit quick please"
Subhankar RoyVerified buyer · Sep 2024
Eco Candle Wicks
★★★★★
"This needle is very helpful as it doesn't damage the mould and there is no leakage of wax while pouring.. I would definitely recommend this .."
LJAug 2024
Premium Candle Wicking Needle
★★★★★
"Good one"
Sneha TamangVerified buyer · Apr 2025
Premium Candle Wicking Needle
★★★★★
"This bamboo wick holder doesn't exert any pressure on the wicks… and it is a very useful product 👌🏻👌🏻.."
Lalitha JaganAug 2024
Bamboo Wick Holder
Reviews collected and published through Judge.me on candlemakingsuppliesindia.store. They are general reviews of the wicks and wick tools named on each card, not assessments of the later-burn tests set out below. Wording is unedited.
Shop Natural Soy Pearl Wax — ₹450.00 / kg Plan my later-burn test
✓ Wax and oil prices pulled 24 September 2026 ✓ Wick packs rechecked 25 September 2026 ✓ GST invoicing · MSDS & IFRA documentation on request
Change Control · One Size Down
On burn one, a candle is full, the glass is cold and the wick has its longest tip — a lighter wick can look perfect. The edge of that first pool then becomes a boundary. Whether it fades or grows into a tunnel only shows over the next burns, and faster when customers burn for less time than you do.
5.12 g
of wax stranded per cm burned when a 7.0 cm pool sits in a 7.5 cm jar (illustrative, ≈0.9 g/cm³) — about 25.8 g over a 200 g candle in the worst case
Quick answers — read this first
Why test beyond the first burn after sizing a wick down? The first burn is the easiest: full candle, cold glass, long tip. A slightly short pool can set a memory ring that later burns follow and grow into a tunnel.

What should I look for in later burns? Whether the pool reaches the glass every burn, whether any rim shrinks or grows by burn 3, throw, and drowning or early go-out in the last burns.

Why a short-burn test? Many customers burn for an hour or two. A lighter wick is less forgiving of short burns than the approved one, so test a pair on a shorter cycle.

How many candles? Ten — three control and three down-size on your normal cycle, two of each on a short cycle (working practice). The kit is ₹2,603.44 on CSI's listed prices.
The short answer
Answer: Because a lighter wick's problems — memory rings, tunnelling, drowning — build over burns. The first burn cannot show them.
Maths: A 7.0 cm pool in a 7.5 cm jar (illustrative) strands 5.12 g per cm burned; up to 25.8 g of a 200 g candle.
Test: Ten candles, standard and short cycles, pool recorded every burn to the end. The wick-change hub has the method.
Shop: Natural Soy Pearl Wax · Mango Coconut · Eco Candle Wicks · WhatsApp.
In this guide
One size down: why a good first burn proves little Schematic side views — what tunnelling can look like over a candle's life, not a measurement Burn 1 pool nearly to the glass Burn 3 a thin rim stays behind Mid-life rim thickens, pool narrows Last burns tunnel; flame can drown Darker bands = wax left on the glass. A first-burn check sees only the left-hand jar.
Schematic only — how tunnelling can develop in a candle whose wick is slightly too light. It does not show a measured CSI result; many down-sizes never do this. The point is that a first-burn check only ever sees the left-hand jar.
Wax for the test
Natural Soy Pearl Wax · ₹450.00 / kg
Lighter wick to test
Eco Candle Wicks Thin C1 · ₹59.00 / 10
Plan it with us
Send your jar details on WhatsApp
Straight answer
I moved one wick size down temporarily and the first burn looks fine — why do I still need to test the candle through later burns?
Because the first burn is the easiest burn a candle ever has. The candle is full, the glass is cold and the wick has its longest free tip, so a slightly lighter wick can produce a pool that looks full, or nearly full. But the edge of that first pool becomes a boundary: later burns tend to follow it, leaving a memory ring that can grow into a tunnel, and in the last burns a small flame deep in the tunnel can drown or go out early. None of that is visible on burn one. Customers make it worse by burning for shorter times than your test cycle, and a lighter wick is less forgiving of short burns. So keep your fragrance, colour and storage results, and repeat the combustion lines with the pool diameter recorded every burn: does any rim shrink or grow by burn 3, does the pool still reach the glass at mid-life, does the flame hold to the end, and how much wax is left on the walls? Test ten candles from one melt — control and down-size on your normal cycle, plus a short-cycle pair of each — burned to the end. On CSI's listed prices the kit is ₹2,603.44.
One line: judge a lighter wick by the trend of its pool over burns, including short customer-style burns — never by the first.
A down-sized wick is proved on its fifth burn, not its first. Test ten candles: three normal and three down-size on your usual burn cycle, plus two of each on a shorter cycle like many customers use. In Natural Soy Pearl Wax with Mango Coconut at 8% and a 10-pack of Eco Candle Wicks Thin C1, the kit is ₹2,603.44.
Buy Natural Soy Pearl Wax

Why the first burn is the easiest burn

Every candle starts at its best. A lighter wick only has to be good enough for one evening to fool you.

On the first burn, a container candle is full, the wick has its longest free tip, and the flame sits right at the top of the jar where the glass is widest and nothing has yet set a boundary. A wick one size lighter than the approved one will often produce a pool that looks nearly full, or full, by the end of that first burn. It is easy to conclude the down-size is fine. The problem is that a slightly short pool on burn one does not stay slightly short. The edge of that first pool becomes a boundary the next burns tend to follow, and the candle can gradually burn down a tunnel of its own making.

So the question is not "did the first burn look fine?" but "does the pool reach the glass on every burn, all the way down, even when a customer burns it for less time than you do?" A lighter wick commonly delivers a little less heat, and the consequences show up in stages. Here is what happens at each stage, and what a down-size can hide there.

General candle-making knowledge · what commonly happens, not measured CSI results
Four stages of a candle's life, and what a lighter wick can hide
Stage What is happening What a down-size can hide What to record
Burn 1 Cold glass, full candle, fresh wick with a long first tip A slightly smaller pool still looks close to the edge; any shortfall is hard to see Pool diameter both ways at 3 h; photograph from above
Burns 2–3 The first pool's edge has set a boundary A thin rim of unmelted wax can begin — the memory ring Pool diameter and whether the rim is shrinking or staying
Mid-life Surface lower in the jar; rim may be thicker A narrowing pool and a wall of wax above it Pool diameter, depth, time to full pool
Last burns Flame deep inside a tunnel, closer to the base A small flame can drown in its own pool, or struggle and go out early Flame behaviour, drowning, wax left on walls at the end
The CSI principle
A lighter wick is judged by its trend, not its first result.
Record the pool diameter every burn. A rim that shrinks is fine; a rim that holds or grows is the start of a tunnel, whatever the first burn looked like.

Memory rings, tunnelling and drowning

Three related problems are what later burns are looking for. A memory ring is commonly described as the boundary left by an early pool that did not reach the glass: later burns tend to melt to roughly the same edge, leaving a rim of unmelted wax. Tunnelling is that rim growing as the candle burns down: the flame sinks into a narrowing shaft and the wall of unused wax gets taller. Drowning can follow in the last burns: a small flame deep in the tunnel sits in a pool it cannot consume fast enough, and it shrinks, gutters or goes out with wax still left.

Not every down-size does this. A lighter wick in a candle that was designed with some headroom may reach the glass on every burn and simply burn a little longer — which is a fine result. The point is that you cannot tell which kind of down-size you have from the first burn. You can tell by burn three, and you can be sure by the end. The cleaner-but-smaller post covers how to judge a wick whose pool stops just short, and the smaller-flame post covers a wick whose pool gets to the edge eventually.

"Tell customers to burn it until the pool reaches the edge." That instruction is sensible for any candle and belongs on every label. It does not rescue a wick that cannot reach the edge in a reasonable burn. Many customers burn for an hour or two at a time, and a lighter wick is less forgiving of short burns than the approved one. That is why this test includes a short-cycle pair — it tests the candle the way it will actually be used.

What a tunnel costs, in grams

Tunnelling strands wax. How much is geometry: the unmelted ring's area times how far the candle has burned down, times the wax density. This table uses an illustrative 7.5 cm internal-diameter jar (measure yours) and an approximate 0.9 g/cm³ (a labelled assumption; it varies by wax and temperature). A 200 g candle in that jar is about 5.03 cm deep. "Full depth" is the worst case — a pool that stays at that diameter for the whole candle. The value column uses CSI's listed production prices for Mango Coconut (1 kg, ₹3,964.00) and Natural Soy Pearl Wax (10 kg, ₹4,248.00): ₹0.71 per gram of 8% candle mix.

Illustrative 7.5 cm jar · ≈0.9 g/cm³ (assumption) · worst case = ring for the full 5.03 cm
Pool diameter → wax stranded on the glass
Pool diameter Ring area Stranded per cm burned Stranded over full depth Value of that wax and oil
7.2 cm 3.46 cm² 3.12 g 15.7 g (7.8%) ₹11.10
7.0 cm 5.69 cm² 5.12 g 25.8 g (12.9%) ₹18.25
6.8 cm 7.86 cm² 7.08 g 35.6 g (17.8%) ₹25.20
6.5 cm 11.00 cm² 9.90 g 49.8 g (24.9%) ₹35.24

A pool of 7.0 cm in a 7.5 cm jar — 2.5 mm short on each side, easily missed on burn one — strands 5.12 g of wax for every centimetre the candle burns down. Over the full depth that is about 25.8 g of a 200 g candle, roughly 13%. The material value is small (₹18.25); the reputational cost of a candle that ends as a tube of wax is not. These are worst-case figures. A real down-size may narrow the gap over later burns — which is exactly what the test finds out.

What to retest

KEEP · CONFIRM · REPEAT · NEW · wick moved one size down, first burn looks fine
Retest matrix
Earlier result Status Why
Fragrance load, cold throw, colour, storage KEEP Unlit-candle results; wax and oil unchanged
Wick set and centring CONFIRM A lighter wick can be softer and drift while setting
Pool diameter every burn and the burn it first reaches glass REPEAT The trend matters more than any single reading
Pool depth and time to full pool REPEAT A lighter wick commonly takes longer
Hot throw REPEAT A smaller, cooler pool can throw less
Flame height, soot, mushroom REPEAT Usually no worse — confirm
Jar-side heat REPEAT Usually no hotter — confirm
End of life: drowning, wax left on walls REPEAT Where a down-size most often fails
Short-burn behaviour (customer burns shorter than your cycle) NEW A lighter wick is less forgiving of short burns

The NEW line — short-burn behaviour — reflects how the risk changes with a lighter wick. Your approved wick may have had enough headroom that a customer burning for two hours still got a full pool; a lighter wick may not. You probably never tested short burns before because you did not need to. Now you do.

The ten-candle test and burn schedule

Ten candles · one melt · working practice
Test plan
Group Candles Wick Burn cycle
Control, standard 3 Normal approved wick Your usual cycle (a commonly used 3–4 h)
Down-size, standard 3 One size lighter Same
Control, short 2 Normal approved wick Shorter cycle — for example 2 h (a labelled example; choose what your customers do)
Down-size, short 2 One size lighter Same short cycle
Total 10 Full cool-down between every burn

Pour all ten from one melt of Natural Soy Pearl Wax with Mango Coconut at 8% — 16 g of oil and 184 g of wax per 200 g candle. No fragrance ceiling for Soy Pearl is published in this data, so 8% is a labelled test load; check the product page or ask CSI on WhatsApp for the wax maker's maximum, and follow the wax maker's instructions for temperatures. The short-cycle pair are not a harsher test for its own sake; they are the customer who lights the candle for an evening meal and blows it out.

What to record, and when · both cycles
Burn schedule
Burn Record Also
1 Pool diameter both ways at 1 h and 3 h; photo from above; flame; weight Time to full pool, if it gets there
2 Same; note any rim left from burn 1 Throw, blind
3 Same; is the rim shrinking, steady or growing? Throw, blind
Every later burn Pool diameter at 3 h; weight Photo from above every second burn
Mid-life (surface half-way down) Full set: pool, depth, flame, jar-side heat, soot Throw, blind
Last three burns Full set; flame behaviour; any drowning or early out Base feel
End Scrape and weigh the wax left on the walls Compare with control
Test the candle the way you burn it. Then test it the way your customers burn it.
1
Mark the thirds and label every jarTwo small marks on the outside of each jar split the wax into thirds; a label says group, wick and cycle. You will always know which stage a burn belongs to.
2
Run both cycles in the same roomLight the standard and short groups together. Extinguish the short pair at the end of the short cycle and leave the standard group burning. Full cool-down before the next session for all ten.
3
Read the rim on burns 2 and 3Before lighting, look down at each candle: is there a rim of unmelted wax at the glass from the previous burn? Record none / thin / clear, and whether it is smaller or larger than last time.
4
Stop a group only on a clear failIf a down-size group's rim is clearly growing by burn 3, you can stop that group — it has failed. A group that is passing keeps going to the end; approval needs the last burns.
5
Finish with the scaleWhen each candle is spent, scrape and weigh the wall wax. Average by group. This single number summarises everything the rim trend was warning you about.
Photograph from directly above
A phone held at the same height above every candle, with a ruler laid across the jar rim, turns pool diameter and rim width into something you can compare across burns and groups. File the photos by group and burn number.

Scoring sheet: the trend lines

Averages per group · blank for you to fill
Scoring sheet — one size down
Line Control std Down std Control short Down short Acceptance (written in advance)
Burn on which pool first reaches glass all round Down-size ≤ control's burn, in both cycles
Pool diameter at 3 h — burn 3 (cm) Full to the glass
Pool diameter at 3 h — mid-life (cm) Full to the glass
Rim trend over burns 1–3 (shrinking / steady / growing) Shrinking or none
Hot throw, blind (0–5) Equal to control
Drowning or early go-out in last burns (yes/no) No, where control is no
Wall wax at end (g) No more than control

Safety lines — flame height, soot, mushrooming, jar-side heat — are recorded too, and a lighter wick will usually pass them comfortably. They still count: acceptance is no worse than your approved control on every safety line, within your jar supplier's guidance and the candle fire-safety standard you work to. CSI publishes no numeric flame-height or jar-temperature limit. ASTM F2417 is a commonly cited US standard; if you work to it, use its methods.

The first burn tells you the wick can light a candle. The fifth tells you whether it can finish one.
— CandleMakingSuppliesIndia

Deciding on a temporary down-size

Decision rule · written before testing · working practice
Result → action
What the sheet shows Verdict Action
Pool reaches glass by control's burn in both cycles; rim shrinks; no drowning; wall wax ≤ control; throw equal Pass Use as a temporary substitute; record it; review when the normal wick returns
Passes on the standard cycle, fails on the short cycle Conditional Only if your first-burn instructions are clear and you accept the risk; most makers treat this as a fail
Rim holds or grows by burn 3 Fail Stop that group; wait for the normal wick or test another candidate
Drowning or early go-out in the last burns Fail Do not use
Throw weaker, blind Fail as a replacement A cooler pool is releasing less fragrance

Two honest notes. First, the full-life test takes time: a 200 g candle burned in cycles is many sessions, and the short-cycle pair take more. If you are short of time, burns 1–3 on all ten candles will already show a growing rim, and that is enough to reject a down-size — but not enough to approve one; approval still needs the end. Second, do not compensate by raising the fragrance load, changing the fill or pouring hotter to make a lighter wick work. That is reformulating the candle around a stock-out, and the 5,000-wicks post explains why it is rarely the right way round.

Argued against our own interest, plainly. If you are dropping from a heavier wick to our Eco Thin C1 because your usual one is out, we would rather you tested it to the end than ordered a thousand on the strength of a good first burn. CSI does not publish its construction or where it sits against your old size. Burn ten candles; if the rim grows by burn three, you will have spent ₹59.00 on wicks to avoid a season of tunnelled candles.

The priced test kit

Ten 200 g candles in Natural Soy Pearl Wax with Mango Coconut Fragrance Oil at 8%, and a 5% pour-loss allowance (a labelled working assumption). The five control candles use your remaining normal wicks. Use your own production wax and oil if they differ.

Ten-candle down-size test · wax & oil CSI live pricing, pulled 24 September 2026 · wicks & jars Figures verified 10 September 2026 (Blog 760), wick packs rechecked 25 September 2026
Shopping list for the test
Item Need Buy Price
Natural Soy Pearl Wax 10 × 184 g + 5% = 1,932.0 g 2 × 1 kg ₹900.00
Mango Coconut Fragrance Oil 10 × 16 g + 5% = 168.0 g 1 × 100 g + 1 × 50 g + 2 × 15 g ₹936.44
Eco Candle Wicks Thin C1 (the lighter Eco listing) 5 down-size candles + spares 1 × 10 ₹59.00
White Matte Glass Jar (only if it is your production jar) 10 jars 2 packs of 5 ₹708.00
Test kit ₹2,603.44

Natural Soy Pearl Wax is sold from 1 kg (₹450.00), so the test needs two 1 kg bags. It is the one CSI container wax with a real per-kilo break — ₹424.80 a kilo from 5 kg — which matters for production, not for a test. Mango Coconut is bought as 1 × 100 g + 1 × 50 g + 2 × 15 g (₹936.44) for 168.0 g. Labour, electricity and time are not included.

1
Soy container wax · ceiling not published here
Natural Soy Pearl Wax
Pearl-form soy wax with the only real per-kilo break among CSI's container waxes. No fragrance ceiling for it is published in this data — check the product page or ask CSI; 8% here is a labelled test load.
Bag Price Per kg
1 kg ₹450.00 ₹450.00
5 kg ₹2,124.00 ₹424.80
10 kg ₹4,248.00 ₹424.80
50 kg ₹21,240.00 ₹424.80
₹900.00 for 2 kg Buy Natural Soy Pearl Wax
2
Fixed oil for the test
Mango Coconut Fragrance Oil
A tropical blend near the top of CSI's best-selling sort, and one of the oils with a real 1 kg saving (20.7% below the 100 g per-gram rate). Fixed in this test — only the wick changes.
Size Price Per g 200 g candles at 16 g Stock
15 g ₹93.22 ₹6.21 0.94 In stock
50 g ₹250.00 ₹5.00 3.12 In stock
100 g ₹500.00 ₹5.00 6.25 In stock
500 g ₹1,982.00 ₹3.96 31.25 In stock
1 kg ₹3,964.00 ₹3.96 62.50 In stock
₹936.44 for 180 g Buy Mango Coconut
3
The lighter Eco listing · construction not published
Eco Candle Wicks — Thin C1
₹5.90 per wick at every pack. If you are stepping down to it from a heavier wick, test it to the end: CSI does not publish its construction or where it sits against another supplier's size.
Pack Price Per wick
10 ₹59.00 ₹5.90
20 ₹118.00 ₹5.90
50 ₹295.00 ₹5.90
100 ₹590.00 ₹5.90
500 ₹2,950.00 ₹5.90
1000 ₹5,900.00 ₹5.90
₹59.00 for 10 Buy Eco Candle Wicks

Recording a temporary down-size

Record the down-size as a temporary substitution: normal wick, substitute, reason and date, test results by burn (the rim trend in one line is enough — "rim gone by burn 2 in both cycles"), SKUs and batches made on it, and a review date. When your normal wick returns, switch back and close the record — or, if you want to keep the lighter wick, re-approve it as a permanent change with the full-life results attached. Keep ten substitute wicks and one finished candle from the first batch as retained samples. The size-up post covers the opposite substitution, and the replacement-documentation post shows how to write the record so it makes sense a year later.

Related wick changes: if the down-size also came with a different tab, the tab-height post covers wax left at the bottom and how the flame ends. If you use the lighter wick across several oils, the lavender-versus-vanilla post explains why one fragrance passing does not clear the others. If a large order is due before a full-life test can finish, the emergency 1,000-candle post sets out the smallest defensible check, and the full wick-change checklist lists every line.

Planning festive stock before Diwali (8 November 2026)? If your usual wick is short and you are considering a lighter one, tell us your jar, wax and oil on WhatsApp. We will check what is in stock and help you plan the test; larger quantities are quoted on request, with no published volume discount.
Ask about wicks on WhatsApp
Why trust this guide

CANDLEMAKINGSUPPLIESINDIA supplies raw materials, not finished candles. If the lighter wick is ours, this page still tells you to burn it to the end before ordering more. We do not publish our wicks' construction or where any size sits against another supplier's.

Wax and oil prices are CSI live listings pulled on 24 September 2026; wick and jar prices are those verified for Blog 760 on 10 September 2026, with wick packs rechecked on 25 September 2026. Stranded-wax figures are geometry (π × d² ÷ 4 for each circle) with an approximate 0.9 g/cm³ density and an illustrative 7.5 cm jar — worst-case arithmetic, not measurements.

The descriptions of memory rings, tunnelling and drowning are general candle-making knowledge phrased as what commonly happens. Candle counts, the 3–4 h and example 2 h cycles, the burn schedule and the 5% loss allowance are working practices. No fragrance ceiling for Soy Pearl is published here. CSI publishes no flame-height or jar-temperature limit. For help: WhatsApp +91 7397976926.

Frequently asked questions

Why does my candle tunnel after the first burn?
Commonly because the first pool did not reach the glass and set a boundary that later burns follow. A wick slightly too light for the jar, or burns that are too short, are the usual causes.
What is a candle memory ring?
A rim of unmelted wax left when an early pool stops short of the glass. Later burns tend to melt to the same edge, so the ring can grow into a tunnel.
How many burns does it take to test a wick?
Three burns will show whether a rim is shrinking or growing; approval needs burning to the end of usable wax, because drowning and stranded wax appear last.
Why does a candle flame drown?
A small flame deep in a tunnel can sit in more liquid wax than it can consume, so it shrinks or goes out. It is a common late-life failure of a wick that is too light.
Does a smaller wick make a candle last longer?
It can burn fewer grams per hour, but if it tunnels, the extra hours come with wax left on the glass. Weigh the wall wax at the end against your control.
How long should customers burn a candle the first time?
Long enough for the pool to reach the glass — say so on the label. Test a short-burn pair as well, because many customers will not follow the instruction.
Test the trend
A good first burn is a start. Record the pool every burn, test short burns too, and approve only at the end.
Natural Soy Pearl Wax from ₹450.00 for 1 kg, Mango Coconut from ₹93.22 for 15 g and Eco Candle Wicks Thin C1 at ₹59.00 for 10. Send us your jar and wick details and we will help you plan the later-burn test.
Shop Natural Soy Pearl Wax Plan my later-burn test
Continue the read — I changed my wick
Editorial standards & sources
About this guide: Written by the CANDLEMAKINGSUPPLIESINDIA team. The burn schedule and short-cycle test apply to any lighter wick from any supplier. No CSI wick is described as equivalent to, or a fixed step from, another size.

Customer reviews: The six reviews at the top of this page are genuine, published Judge.me reviews left by CSI customers on the product pages named on each card — Eco Candle Wicks, Premium Candle Wicking Needle and Bamboo Wick Holder. They are general product reviews, not assessments of the guidance set out here. Names, star ratings, dates and products are as recorded by Judge.me and wording is unedited. "Verified buyer" appears only on the three reviews Judge.me recorded as verified — Monika Deep, Subhankar Roy and Sneha Tamang; the reviews from Ashwini, LJ and Lalitha Jagan are published but not recorded as verified, and carry no badge.

Figures pulled 24 September 2026, CSI live pricing: Natural Soy Pearl Wax ₹450.00 / 1 kg, ₹2,124.00 / 5 kg, ₹4,248.00 / 10 kg, ₹21,240.00 / 50 kg. Mango Coconut Fragrance Oil ₹93.22 / 15 g, ₹250.00 / 50 g, ₹500.00 / 100 g, ₹1,982.00 / 500 g, ₹3,964.00 / 1 kg. Figures verified 10 September 2026 (Blog 760), wick packs rechecked 25 September 2026: Eco Candle Wicks Thin C1 ₹59.00 / 10 … ₹5,900.00 / 1,000 (₹5.90 each); White Matte Glass Jar ₹354.00 / 5.

Non-price figures and assumptions: CSI convention: oil = candle weight × load. The 200 g candle, 8% test load, 5% pour loss, ten-candle design, 3–4 h and example 2 h cycles, the 7.5 cm jar, the pool diameters and the ≈0.9 g/cm³ density are labelled working assumptions or illustrations. No fragrance ceiling for Soy Pearl is published here. Wick construction is not published for any CSI wick. Costs exclude labour, packaging, freight and GST.
Back to blog