How Do I Create a Candle Batch Sheet That Records Wax Lot, Fragrance Lot, Wick Lot, Temperatures and Timings so I Can Trace Future Failures?
Share
What makes the trace work backwards? Two small extras: a lot register (one line per bag, bottle, pack or carton, listing the batch codes that used it) and a retained-sample shelf (two candles per batch, coded). With those, a complaint months later leads from the code on the base to the batch, to every batch sharing its lots, and to candles you can compare side by side.
Does CSI give lot numbers? CSI doesn't publish lot or batch data. Record your order number and delivery date as the lot, and ask on WhatsApp for the lot number of what you received.
What should I buy? Nothing for the sheet itself. For traceability, larger single lots help (one wax bag or wick pack across many batches), but only in quantities you will use while fresh.
- Straight answer: the sheet that traces failures
- What the sheet has to do: trace both ways
- The batch sheet, section by section
- Codes that make the trace possible
- The lot register and the retained-sample shelf
- A worked trace: January complaint, October batch
- Filling it in without slowing production
- Wax, wicks, jars and the oil in the worked example
- Frequently asked questions
What the sheet has to do: trace both ways
Most batch records are written forwards: what went into this batch. A trace runs the other way. A customer, a stockist or your own shelf check tells you one candle has a problem, and you need to know which batch it came from, what was different about that batch, which other batches share its materials, and how many units are out there. A sheet that only records forwards can't answer the last two questions without hours of searching.
So the template below is built around three links. Candle to batch is the code on the base. Batch to lots is the lot section. Lot to batches is the lot register. Two more links make the evidence physical: batch to retained candles (the retained-sample codes) and batch to burn results (the burn-log ID). Which process fields to include, and why each one earns its line, is the process-information post. This post is the layout and the trace.
The batch sheet, section by section
| Section | Column | Example entry |
|---|---|---|
| Header | Batch code · pour date · operator · SKU | BRS-261012-B · 12 Oct 2026 · NK · British Rose 150 g |
| Header | Formula card and version | BR-8 v2 (British Rose 8% of total, CSI 464, C1, 150 g jar) |
| Lots | Wax: product, lot or order code, date opened | CSI 464 10 kg · W-0925 (delivered 25 Sep) · opened 10 Oct |
| Lots | Fragrance: product, lot or order code, date opened | British Rose 1 kg · F-1003 · opened 12 Oct |
| Lots | Wick: type, pack code | Eco C1, pack of 1000 · K-0901 |
| Lots | Jar: product, delivery code; dye if any | 150 g clear jar · J-0918 · no dye |
| Weights | Basis · batch size · oil target/actual · wax target/actual · scale ID | of total · 30 × 150 g = 4,500 g · oil 360 g/360 g · wax 4,140 g/4,140 g · S1 |
| Temps and times | Wax at temperature (time) · oil add °C and time · probe ID | 10:40 · 78°C at 10:52 · P1 (ice-checked 1 Oct) |
| Temps and times | Stir minutes · pour start °C/time · pour end °C/time · room °C | 45 s · 83°C 11:00 · 81°C 11:20 · 29°C |
| Output | Poured · rejects (reason) · pour-order range on bases | 30 · 1 (sinkhole) · -01 to -30 |
| Output | Retained-sample codes and shelf spot | B-R1 (-15), B-R2 (-30) · shelf 3, box Oct |
| QC | Cure rack spot · QC burn date and age · burn-log ID · result | Rack 2 · 22 Oct, day 10 · BL-114 · passed |
| QC | Released by · date · shipped to | Owner · 23 Oct · gifting order G-117 |
| After sale | Complaint log IDs linked to this batch | C-004 (Jan 2027): light sweat, weaker scent |
Two choices in the template are deliberate. Targets and actuals sit side by side, so a batch that missed its target shows it at a glance. And the retained samples are chosen from the middle and the end of the pour order (-15 and -30), so if early and late candles ever differ, you have both. The worked example's SOP reads the oil add at 85°C and pours at 80–85°C. That sits inside the CSI 464 page's "Pour Temperature 80°C – 90°C" and under the 150 g jar page's "Safe for hot pour up to 85°C". Batch B's 78°C add is a departure the sheet makes visible.
Codes that make the trace possible
The batch code is the one field that must survive the sale. It goes on the base of every candle, written or printed, small enough not to spoil the look and permanent enough to outlast a year on someone's shelf. The worked example's code is BRS-261012-B-17: scent (BRS), pour date as YYMMDD (261012), batch letter for that day (B), and the candle's number in the pour order (17). The pour number is optional, but it lets you tell an early candle from a late one without guessing.
| Thing | Code | Where it's written |
|---|---|---|
| Batch | BRS-261012-B | Sheet, cure-rack tray, shipping note |
| Candle | BRS-261012-B-17 | Base of the candle |
| Retained sample | B-R1, B-R2 (with the batch code) | Candle base and the shelf box |
| Wax, oil, wick, jar lots | W-0925, F-1003, K-0901, J-0918 (type + delivery date) | The bag, bottle, pack or carton, the sheet and the lot register |
| Formula card | BR-8 v2 | Card and sheet header |
| Burn log, complaint | BL-114, C-004 | Their own logs, cross-referenced on the sheet |
Because CSI doesn't publish lot or batch release data, your delivery code is the lot you control. It's worth asking on WhatsApp for the supplier's lot number of what you received and adding it beside your own code, but the trace doesn't depend on it: your code already separates one bag from the next. Nothing on this page implies any CSI batch changed; the trace is there to show whether anything did.
The lot register and the retained-sample shelf
The lot register is a single page, or a tab if you use a spreadsheet: one line per container, added the day it's opened. Each time a batch uses it, that batch code is added to the line. When a complaint points at a batch, the register tells you in a minute which sibling batches shared its oil bottle, wax bag, wick pack and jar carton. Those siblings are your controls.
| Lot code | Item | Opened | Batches that used it | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| W-0925 | Luxury Soy Wax CSI 464, 10 kg | 10 Oct | BRS-261012-A, BRS-261012-B | 1,720 g left after A and B |
| F-1003 | British Rose, 1 kg | 12 Oct | BRS-261012-A, BRS-261012-B | 280 g left |
| K-0901 | Eco C1, pack of 1000 | 1 Sep | Batches A to F across scents | — |
| J-0918 | 150 g clear jars, delivery of 18 Sep | 18 Sep | A, B, C | Three jars measured on arrival |
The retained-sample shelf is the physical half of the trace. Two candles per batch, coded, stored together somewhere cool and stable, out of sun, with lids on. The CSI 464 page's own storage advice, "Store in a cool, dry place. Avoid direct sunlight or moisture.", is a sensible habit for finished candles too (judgement). In the worked example two retained candles are ₹414.27 of materials, 6.7% of a 30-candle batch. How long to keep them is judgement: at least until the last candle from that batch could reasonably still be in a customer's home, which for gifting stock is often many months.
A worked trace: January complaint, October batch
Worked example, set in the future. In January 2027 a gifting client reports that a British Rose candle has "a light oily film on top and a weaker scent than the others". The code on the base is BRS-261012-B-17. Here is the trace, step by step, with what each step can rule in or out.
| Retained samples show | Most likely | Confirm by | Next |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complained batch faulty, sibling fine | That batch's process | Sheet rows that differ from the sibling's | SOP and training; contact buyers of that batch |
| Both faulty | A shared lot | Register: other batches on the same lot, and their retained samples | Lot posts (wax lot, wick lot); ask CSI on WhatsApp with your lot codes |
| Both fine | Storage or use after sale | Customer details: storage, room, burn habits (the customer-usage intake) | Care card, packaging, storage advice |
| No retained sample kept | Unknown | A fresh re-pour from the same lots at the sheet's readings | Keep two per batch from now on |
The exposure is concrete. One candle in the worked example is ₹207.14 in materials (British Rose ₹36.82, CSI 464 ₹70.02, jar ₹94.40, C1 ₹5.90), so batch B's 27 shipped units are ₹5,592.70. Without the sheet, the only safe response would be to suspect every British Rose candle made that season. When complaints aren't one-offs but keep appearing across batches, the tool changes: the defect cross-tab tallies them by lot, operator, day and SKU.
Filling it in without slowing production
The sheet works only if it's filled in at the bench, as things happen: a printed page on a clipboard beside the melter, the probe and scale IDs pre-printed, the lot codes copied from the containers in front of you. Most columns take seconds. Keep the finished sheets in pour-date order, one folder per month, and the lot register in the front of the current folder. A spreadsheet works just as well if someone types the sheets up the same day; the paper original stays.
If you want a check that the system works before you need it, run a mock trace once a quarter. Pick a random candle code from stock, and time how long it takes to reach the sheet, the lots, the siblings and the retained samples. If any step takes more than a few minutes, fix that link. For what to do when production grows and complaints stop being single events, the cluster hub ranks what to investigate first.
Wax, wicks, jars and the oil in the worked example
Four items: the wax, wick, jar and oil the worked example traces, each with what it means for the sheet's lot columns. They are chosen on page statements, pack sizes, price and stock on 26 September 2026. CSI has no batch-variation data, so nothing is ranked on consistency. Load is 8% of total weight: 12 g of oil and 138 g of wax per 150 g candle. If you ever step the load up, the CSI 464 page states up to 10% (15 g), with 9% (13.5 g) as a cautious top rung because the ceiling's basis isn't stated.
| Size | Price | Per unit | What it covers |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 g | ₹260.00 | ₹0.52 per g | a test pour; dearer per gram, and a different bag from production |
| 1 kg | ₹507.40 | ₹0.51 per g | small batches; one bag, one lot line on the sheet |
| 5 kg | ₹2,537.00 | ₹0.51 per g | one bag across a week of batches |
| 10 kg | ₹5,074.00 | ₹0.51 per g | 72 candles at 8% from one bag: one wax lot on every sheet |
| Size | Price | Per unit | What it covers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thin (C1) / 10 | ₹59.00 | ₹5.90 | testing; the same per wick as every C1 pack |
| Thin (C1) / 100 | ₹590.00 | ₹5.90 | a few batches from one pack |
| Thin (C1) / 500 | ₹2,950.00 | ₹5.90 | a season of small batches |
| Thin (C1) / 1000 | ₹5,900.00 | ₹5.90 | 33 whole 30-candle batches from one wick lot |
| Size | Price | Per unit | What it covers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pack of 10 | ₹944.00 | ₹94.40 | testing and retained-sample spares |
| Pack of 20 | ₹1,888.00 | ₹94.40 | production; the same per jar |
| Size | Price | Per gram | 150 g candles at 8% | In the worked example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 g | ₹94.40 | ₹6.29 | 1 | one test candle |
| 50 g | ₹212.40 | ₹4.25 | 4 | a four-candle check |
| 100 g | ₹342.20 | ₹3.42 | 8 | a check plus retest |
| 500 g | ₹1,593.00 | ₹3.19 | 41 | about one 30-candle batch (360 g) with spare |
| 1 kg | ₹3,068.00 | ₹3.07 | 83 | batches A and B (720 g) with 280 g left |
CandleMakingSuppliesIndia sells the wax, wicks, jars and oil named here, and does not sell finished candles. This page still tells you that traceability doesn't require bigger orders, that the 1000-wick pack is no cheaper per wick than the pack of 10, and that the sheet, the register and the retained shelf cost you nothing from us.
Every price was verified on CSI's live store on 26 September 2026. Every size in the pick tables is in stock on that date, and the tables are built to flag any size that is not. Page wording is quoted as captured. CSI publishes no lot or batch release data or reformulation notices; lot numbers are available by asking on WhatsApp.
The codes, the batch, the complaint and every reading in the trace are a worked example set in the future, and they imply no change in any CSI material. The template layout, code conventions, retention of two candles and the reading of a trace are editorial judgement. For bulk pricing, GST invoicing, and MSDS and IFRA documentation on request, message us on WhatsApp at +91 7397976926.
Frequently asked questions
- My Candle Formula Is Written in Percentages but Production Results Still Vary Between Batches — What Additional Process Information Should I Record?
- I Made the Exact Same Candle Formula as Last Month but This Batch Has Weaker Hot Throw — Which Raw Material Should I Investigate First?
- My Candle Business Is Scaling and Random Quality Problems Are Increasing — How Do I Determine Whether the Problem Is Raw-Material Variation or Production Inconsistency?
- One Employee Makes Perfect Candles with My Formula but Another Gets Rough Tops and Inconsistent Scent — Which Process Variables Should I Standardise?
- I Opened a New Carton of Candle Wicks and Suddenly My Flames Are Smaller — How Do I Compare the New Wick Batch with the Previous One?
- My Candle Jar Supplier Changed the Glass Slightly but Kept the Same Listed Capacity — Do I Need to Repeat Wick Testing?
- My New Soy Wax Batch Feels Softer than the Previous One and My Candles Burn Differently — How Do I Verify Whether the Wax Itself Changed?
- My Candle Passed Every Internal Test but Customers Are Reporting Tunnelling — How Do I Determine Whether the Formula Is Wrong or Customers Are Burning the Candle for Too Little Time?
Customer reviews: The six reviews at the top of this page are genuine, published Judge.me reviews left by CSI customers on the product pages named on each card — British Rose Fragrance Oil, Clear Glass Jar with Golden Lid (150 gram), Eco Candle Wicks, Premium Coconut Soy Wax CSI 468 (Flakes Form) For Container Candles. They are general product reviews, not assessments of the diagnostic advice on this page. Names, star ratings, dates and products are as recorded by Judge.me and wording is unedited. "Verified buyer" appears only on reviews Judge.me recorded as verified — Arshad Shaikh, Monika Deep, Soumili Gope, Arminder Kaur. The reviews from Emma Bechara, Ashwini are published but not recorded as verified, and carry no badge. Reviews below five stars are included as published, not filtered out.
Figures verified 26 September 2026, CSI live pricing: Luxury Soy Wax CSI 464 500 g ₹260.00, 1 kg ₹507.40, 5 kg ₹2,537.00, 10 kg ₹5,074.00; Eco Candle Wicks Thin (C1) 10 ₹59.00, 100 ₹590.00, 500 ₹2,950.00, 1000 ₹5,900.00; Clear Glass Jar with Golden Lid (150 gram) Pack of 10 ₹944.00, Pack of 20 ₹1,888.00; British Rose Fragrance Oil 15 g ₹94.40, 50 g ₹212.40, 100 g ₹342.20, 500 g ₹1,593.00, 1 kg ₹3,068.00. All in stock on 26 September 2026. Per gram = price ÷ grams; per unit = pack price ÷ units; two decimals. Worked costs use the exact per-gram price, then round.
Non-price figures: load is a percentage of total candle weight (150 g at 8% = 12 g oil + 138 g wax; 9% = 13.5 g; 10% = 15 g); a 30-candle batch is 360 g oil + 4,140 g wax. Page wording: CSI 464 pour 80–90°C, up to 10%, "Store in a cool, dry place"; British Rose "candles (up to 10% soy, up to 6% paraffin)"; 150 g clear jar "150g fill capacity", height 8 cm, outer diameter 7 cm, hot pour up to 85°C. These are formulation limits, not regulatory limits. All codes, dates, readings, the January 2027 complaint and the 30-candle batches are a worked example; the template, code conventions, two retained candles per batch and the trace-reading table are editorial judgement. Costs exclude labour, freight, packaging and GST. Diwali 8 November 2026 is a calendar fact.