My New Coffee Fragrance Has Stronger Cold Throw but Weaker Hot Throw Than the Previous Lot — What Should I Compare Before Approving It?
Share
What must be identical in the comparison? Wax bag, jar, wick packet, load, pour and addition temperature, pour date, cure shelf and test room. Only the oil lot should differ.
Why measure the melt pool? If the new-lot candle has a smaller pool, weaker hot throw may come from combustion or wick, not from the fragrance lot.
Should I just raise the load? Not as a goods-in fix. A higher load changes the candle, needs new wick and surface checks, and costs more per candle.
Why cold and hot throw can move in opposite directions
Cold throw and hot throw are driven by different things. Cold throw is what evaporates from a solid candle surface at room temperature, so it leans on the lighter, more volatile materials in the blend. Hot throw is what the melt pool releases once it is warm and liquid, so it depends on the whole blend, on how much of the oil is still in the wax after curing, and on how big and hot the melt pool actually gets.
That is why the two can drift apart. If a new lot of coffee carries slightly more of its bright, volatile top material and slightly less of its heavier heart and base, the cold jar can smell punchier while the lit candle feels thinner. CSI's Roasted Coffee page describes exactly that kind of layered structure: fresh coffee beans at the top, dark chocolate and espresso in the middle, vanilla and caramel in the base. A shift in balance between those layers is enough to produce your symptom.
But the lot is only one suspect. A different wick delivery that makes a smaller melt pool, candles of different ages, a warmer or cooler test room, or a change in how you added the oil can all do the same thing. Before you approve or reject the lot, you need a comparison that holds everything else still.
What to compare, and how to keep it fair
The goal is a paired test where the only difference between two candles is the oil lot.
Standardise the test room as carefully as the candles. Pick one closed room of a size similar to where customers burn candles, keep windows and fans the same for every session, and let the room air out fully between burns so the second candle is not judged against the ghost of the first. Coffee is a heavy, lingering scent, so a longer airing break than you would allow for citrus is sensible. Record the room, the time of day and roughly how warm it was; a hot afternoon and a cool morning can shift hot throw on their own.
Use at least two assessors besides yourself, and ask them to describe what they smell rather than simply score it. "Coffee at the door, chocolate near the candle" tells you far more about a shifted balance than "7 out of 10".
The comparison log
Write the results down in a way that forces the comparison. A shared sheet with both candles in adjacent columns does that better than two separate notes.
| Check | Old lot (retained) | New lot | Same, better or worse? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oil colour at equal depth | Mid brown | Mid brown | Same |
| Strips at 0 / 20 / 60 min | Coffee, then chocolate, then soft vanilla | Brighter coffee, thinner chocolate, faint vanilla | Different balance |
| Cold throw, day 3 (blind rank) | Ranked second by 3 of 3 | Ranked first by 3 of 3 | New stronger |
| Cold throw, day 14 | Ranked second by 2 of 3 | Ranked first by 2 of 3 | New slightly stronger |
| Hot throw at 1 h, day 14 | Clear coffee at the doorway | Faint coffee at the doorway | New weaker |
| Melt pool at 2 h | Close to full width | Close to full width | Same |
| Surface after cure | Dry | Dry | Same |
The example entries tell a clear story. The melt pools match, so the wick is not the cause. The strips already hinted at a thinner heart and base, and the candles confirm it under heat. The difference persists at day 14, so it is not simply cure time. That points to the lot, not the process.
If instead the melt pools had differed, the next step would be to repeat the pair with wicks from the other delivery swapped between candles, before saying anything to the supplier about the oil.
Worked example: is raising the load a fix?
The tempting fix is to push the new lot a little harder. The page states 6–10% for soy, so moving from 8% to 9% stays inside that range. What would it cost, and is it really a fix?
| Load | Oil per candle | Oil cost per candle | Candles per kg (rounded down) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8% | 16 g | 16 ÷ 1,000 × ₹3,738.00 = ₹59.81 | 1,000 ÷ 16 = 62 |
| 9% | 18 g | 18 ÷ 1,000 × ₹3,738.00 = ₹67.28 | 1,000 ÷ 18 = 55 |
| Difference | +2 g | 2 ÷ 1,000 × ₹3,738.00 = ₹7.48 more per candle | 7 fewer candles per kg |
At 200 candles a month, the extra 2 g per candle is 400 g of oil, or 400 ÷ 1,000 × ₹3,738.00 = ₹1,495.20 a month. That is a real cost — but the bigger problem is not the money. A 9% candle is a different candle from your approved 8% one. It needs its own wick check, because more oil can change flame and carbon build-up, and its own surface check, because more oil means more to hold. And it only makes sense if every future lot also needs 9%; if the next delivery matches the old lot again, you would be over-loading it.
So raising the load is a reformulation decision, not a goods-in fix. It belongs after a supplier conversation, not instead of one.
Approve, restrict or hold
Whichever way it goes, record the invoice number and date received — CSI product pages do not publish lot numbers — keep a small retained sample of the new lot, and resist the temptation to blend it into your old stock to average out the throw. That would hide the difference in every candle rather than solve it in any of them.
Where this page fits
CSI already has guides that cover parts of this question. This page covers the goods-in check for the question above; these go deeper on the rest:
Three things to buy for this job
| Option | Price | Status on the September 2026 pull |
|---|---|---|
| 15 g | ₹93.22 | In stock |
| 50 g | ₹230.00 | In stock |
| 100 g | ₹390.00 | In stock |
| 500 g | ₹1,890.00 | In stock |
| 1 kg | ₹3,738.00 | In stock |
| Option | Price | Status on the September 2026 pull |
|---|---|---|
| Thin (C1) × 100 | ₹590.00 | In stock |
| Thin (C1) × 1,000 | ₹5,900.00 | In stock |
| Thick (C2) × 100 | ₹944.00 | In stock |
| Thick (C2) × 1,000 | ₹9,440.00 | In stock |
| Option | Price | Status on the September 2026 pull |
|---|---|---|
| Pack of 5 | ₹147.50 | In stock |
| Pack of 10 | ₹295.00 | In stock |
| Pack of 50 | ₹1,475.00 | In stock |
| Pack of 100 | ₹2,950.00 | In stock |
CANDLEMAKINGSUPPLIESINDIA supplies raw materials and production equipment, not finished candles. This guide separates general quality-control practice from what CSI's own product pages state, says plainly what CSI does not publish (lot numbers, certificates of analysis, tolerances), and labels every sample size, tolerance or retained quantity as a starting point for your own validation.
Prices are live CSI prices from September 2026; product pages are authoritative. Where a spec is not published — such as a lot number, a jar's internal diameter or a wick's burn rate — this guide says so rather than filling the gap.
For bulk quotes, questions about a specific delivery, GST invoicing, IFRA and MSDS documents, message us on WhatsApp at +91 7397976926.
Frequently asked questions
- My Candle Hot Throw Changes Slightly Between Raw-Material Batches — How Do I Determine Whether the Variation Comes From Wax, Fragrance or Wick?
- My New Oud Fragrance Makes the Wick Mushroom More Than the Previous Batch at the Same 8% Load — Can Fragrance-Lot Variation Affect Combustion?
- My New Fragrance Oil Creates Sweating in Soy Wax Even Though the Previous Batch Was Stable at the Same Percentage — What Should I Investigate?
- My Fragrance Oil Separates Slightly When Stored in a Cool Room — Should I Use It Immediately, Warm and Homogenise It, or Ask the Supplier for Guidance Before Production?
- My Fragrance Oil Has Become Cloudy During Cooler Weather — How Do I Determine Whether This Is Temperature-Related or a Genuine Quality Problem?
- My Fragrance Oil Arrived Warm After Courier Transport in Indian Summer — Should I Let It Return to Controlled Room Conditions Before Evaluating Appearance and Odour?
- My Fragrance Oil Bottle Leaked Slightly During Shipping — How Do I Decide Whether the Remaining Material Is Suitable for Commercial Candle Production?
- I Ordered 5 Kg of Fragrance Oil but Received Several Smaller Containers — Should I Compare Them Before Combining Everything Into One Production Container?
- I Received Two Containers With the Same Fragrance Batch Number but They Smell Slightly Different Immediately After Opening — What Should I Do Before Mixing Them?
- Wax, Wick or Fragrance Oil — What Is Causing Weak Hot Throw?
- How to Compare Two Fragrance Oils Using a Controlled Burn Test
Customer reviews: The reviews at the top are genuine, published Judge.me reviews — Sakshi Jain (5★, verified); Ashwini (5★, not recorded as verified); Subhankar Roy (4★, verified); Rahul Singh (5★, verified); Sraddha (5★, verified); Urvashi Patel (4★, verified). Names, ratings, dates and products as recorded by Judge.me.
Product facts (September 2026, CSI live store): Roasted Coffee Fragrance Oil: 15 g ₹93.22, 50 g ₹230.00, 100 g ₹390.00, 500 g ₹1,890.00, 1 kg ₹3,738.00 — top fresh coffee beans, middle dark chocolate and espresso, base vanilla and caramel · flashpoint approximately 191–193°C · vanillin PRESENT in the vanilla/caramel base (percentage not published) — page says slight yellowing in white wax, cosmetic only · soy 6–10% (cure 48–72 h), paraffin 6–8%. Eco Candle Wicks: Thin (C1) × 100 ₹590.00, Thin (C1) × 1,000 ₹5,900.00, Thick (C2) × 100 ₹944.00, Thick (C2) × 1,000 ₹9,440.00 — ₹5.90 (C1) and ₹9.44 (C2) per wick at every pack size. Wax Melts Containers (empty clamshells): Pack of 5 ₹147.50, Pack of 10 ₹295.00, Pack of 50 ₹1,475.00, Pack of 100 ₹2,950.00 — heart or square clamshells.
Assumptions: Fragrance load is a percentage of total candle weight (200 g = 184 g wax + 16 g oil at 8%). CSI product pages do not publish lot numbers, certificates of analysis, tolerances, jar internal diameters, wick dimensions or mould hardness; where this guide needs them, it tells you to measure or ask. Sample sizes, tolerances, retained quantities, test lengths and acceptance rules are suggested starting points to validate, not standards or CSI policy. Hypothetical supplier prices are CSI prices adjusted by the stated percentage and labelled as such. Worked examples are illustrations. Prices and availability change — product pages are authoritative.