I’m Double-Wicking a 9 cm Jar — How Far Apart Should the Two Wicks Be Positioned Before I Begin Comparing Wick Sizes?
शेयर करना
Why fix the spacing first? Because spacing and size both change where the heat goes. If the spacing wanders from candle to candle, a C1-versus-C2 comparison is measuring your hands, not the wicks.
How do I hold the wicks there? Mark the positions, stick each tab on its mark, hold the tops with a bar across the rim, pour, and leave the bar on until the wax sets. Then measure the spacing again at the surface.
What does the comparison cost? Four 300 g candles at 8%, two on a C1 pair and two on a C2 pair at the same spacing: 96 g of oil, 1,104 g of wax, eight wicks and eight stickers, ₹969.85 of materials, your own jars not included.
- Straight answer: where to put the two wicks
- Start from the inside, not the listing
- Two geometric starting points, and the one to use
- Putting the tabs where you meant
- Checking the spacing after the pour
- Only then: comparing sizes at that spacing
- What to buy, and what to skip
- Frequently asked questions
Start from the inside, not the listing
Every distance on this page is measured to the inside of the glass, because that is where the pool stops. Nothing on the listings will give you that: none of CSI's 72 container listings states an internal diameter, and CSI lists no jar at 9 cm at all, so your jar is your own. Measure the inside across the rim, twice at right angles, and again at mid-height and near the base with a strip of card curled inside the jar (overlap length ÷ 3.14). If the three heights differ, set the wicks for the height where the first burns happen, near the top of the wax, and note the rest. The external-versus-internal argument is made in full in the external diameter post; here is the double-wick version.
| Jar figure read as | Inside diameter | Pool area | Area per wick |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jar figure read as the outside (our reading) | 8.3 cm | 54.11 cm² | 27.05 cm² |
| Jar figure read as the inside (if your ruler says so) | 9.0 cm | 63.62 cm² (18% more) | 31.81 cm² |
A 3.5 mm difference per side sounds trivial. At the wick positions it isn't: if you plan for 9 cm inside and the jar is 8.3 cm inside, a pair set 4.5 cm apart sits 1.90 cm from the glass instead of the 2.25 cm you planned, and every decision you make afterwards about "too close to the glass" is made on the wrong numbers.
Two geometric starting points, and the one to use
With two wicks on a diameter, symmetry does most of the work: each wick serves its own half of the pool, 27.05 cm² here. What's left is how far out along that line to put them. Two pieces of geometry give reasonable first answers. Neither predicts how a candle burns; both give you a defensible number to hold constant.
| Rule | What it means | Spacing s | Wall gap along the line | Character |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Centroid | Each wick sits at the centre of mass of its own half of the pool, 4r/(3π) from the centre | 3.52 cm | 2.39 cm | Wicks closer together; more overlap in the middle |
| Halfway (s = r) | Each wick sits halfway between the centre and the glass along the line | 4.15 cm, marked as 4.2 | 2.05 cm at 4.2 | The working choice here: equal room on both sides of each wick |
| Wider | Half a centimetre further out than the working choice | 4.5 cm | 1.90 cm | Closer to the glass along the line; for a ladder later, not the first comparison |
The halfway rule (s = r) is the working choice on this page. Each wick has the same distance to the centre as to the glass along the line, 2.075 cm here, so neither the middle nor the ends of the line are favoured before you have any burn data. Rounded to a markable 4.2 cm (21 mm either side of the centre), it puts each wick 2.05 cm from the glass along the line. The centroid rule puts each wick at the centre of mass of its half of the pool, 0.424 of the radius out from the centre, which gives 3.52 cm. It is a closer, more "inward" start; use it if your jar tapers inward towards the base, where a pair set wider can end up close to the glass lower down.
Two geometric facts to keep in mind while you set up. Along the wick line the glass is close; at right angles to it, it is not: at 4.2 cm apart each wick is 4.65 cm from the walls at right angles to the line, more than twice its 2.05 cm to the glass along it. That is why pairs so often leave a ring on the short axis, and why the ring shape tells you more than the ring size (the 10 cm ring-shape map reads it). And the wider you set the pair, the closer the flames get to the glass along the line; how far is too close is not a number we can give you, and the wall-gap trade is where that balance is tested.
Putting the tabs where you meant
| Holder | Cost | Fits | The catch |
|---|---|---|---|
| Card bar with two holes, 42 mm apart | Nothing | Any jar; your exact spacing | Flexes if thin; tape it to the rim |
| Steel Wick Holder, outer holes | ₹250.00 for 5 | Jars up to 9 cm wide (page) | Hole pitch not stated; measure it |
| Wick Setting Tool (magnetic bar) | ₹399.00 | "compatible with most jar sizes" (page) | Page describes one centred wick |
| Wick Centering Device | ₹118.00 for 5 | Openings "less than 4"" (page) | One 4 mm hole: made for a single wick |
| Two sticks and a rubber band per wick | Nothing | Any jar | Harder to hold exactly 42 mm |
About the Steel Wick Holder. It is the obvious CSI tool for a pair: its page says "3-hole layout fits single, double, or triple wick setups" and "up to 9 cm wide". But the holes are fixed, in a line, and the page states no pitch. If its outer holes are 42 mm apart, it is exactly what you need. If they are, say, 30 or 50 mm apart, using them sets your pair at the holder's spacing, not the one you planned. Measure it before you use it for this test, or ask us for the figure. A jar measured 9 cm outside is at its stated width limit, so check the fit on your rim too.
Checking the spacing after the pour
Measure every candle before it goes into cure. The flame sits where the wick is at the surface, not where the tab is at the base, so a wick that leaned during the pour burns at a different spacing from the one you stuck down. Two millimetres sounds small; at 42 mm it is 5% of the spacing, and a wick that drifts 2 mm toward the glass has only 90% of its planned wall gap left.
| Check | Target | Accept | If not |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centre to centre at the surface | 42 mm | Within about 2 mm (our tolerance) | Mark the candle off-spec; don't use it in the size comparison |
| Each wick to the glass along the line | 2.05 cm each side | The two sides within about 2 mm of each other | The pair is off-centre; the near side will run hotter |
| Wick line through the centre | Both wicks on one diameter | Checked with a ruler across the rim | A pair off the diameter leaves one side short |
| Wicks upright | Vertical from tab to top | No visible lean | A leaning wick moves the flame, whatever the tab says |
Don't straighten a set candle by pushing the wick through firm wax; it cracks the surface and loosens the tab. Mark it off-spec and pour another. Off-spec candles still teach you something (burn one and watch which side runs hotter), but keep them out of the size comparison. Then cure: many soy makers wait about a week before judging; the British Rose page states no cure time in the text we captured, and the 25 of 102 CSI oil pages that do state one say 48–72 hours for soy.
Only then: comparing sizes at that spacing
With the spacing fixed at about 4.2 cm, the first comparison is the one the question is really about: a C1 pair against a C2 pair, two candles each, everything else held: same jar batch, 300 g fill, British Rose at 8% (24 g of oil + 276 g of wax per candle), CSI 464, cure and room. Burn three sessions of 3–4 hours (about 3.3 hours by the rough one-hour-per-2.5 cm rule), in still air, trimmed alike; log width on both axes, depth at the midpoint, flames, soot and any flame lean toward the glass. Never judge the glass by touch.
| What the four candles show | What it means | Next step |
|---|---|---|
| C1 pair passes (full width by burn 3, depth about 1 cm or less, flames calm), C2 pair runs hot | C1 pair is the candidate | Full life on 2 × C1 at 42 mm |
| C1 pair leaves a ring, C2 pair passes | C2 pair is the candidate | Full life on 2 × C2 at 42 mm; watch the lower half |
| Both pass | Keep the C1 pair: less heat for the same result | Full life on 2 × C1 |
| C1 short, C2 hot | Between CSI sizes, or a spacing question | Now, and only now, move the spacing: see the ladder and strip posts |
| Both leave a ring on the axis at right angles to the wicks | Geometry, not size | Read the ring shape before you pour again |
The last two rows are where spacing comes back in, and each has its own post: two wicks set too close making one hot centre is the spacing ladder; a strip left between the wicks is the inward repositioning ladder; and a pair that melts the centre but leaves the outside edge, where you can't tell spacing from size, is the spacing × size 2×2. If you haven't yet decided whether this jar needs two wicks at all, start with the both-builds opening round, and for when a pair makes the pool very deep, depth-width decoupling.
Cost of the comparison. Four candles consume 96 g of British Rose (₹328.32), 1,104 g of CSI 464 (₹560.17), four C1 and four C2 (₹61.36) and eight stickers (₹20.00): ₹969.85, jars not included. Per candle that is ₹238.92 on a C1 pair and ₹246.00 on a C2 pair (₹82.08 of oil, ₹140.04 of wax, stickers ₹5.00). From nothing, the cash is ₹1,422.00 (British Rose 100 g, CSI 464 1 kg and 500 g at ₹767.40, C1 20, C2 10, a sheet of stickers), or ₹1,672.00 with a set of five Steel Wick Holders. The 100 g leaves 4 g; the wax leaves 396 g. All figures exclude labour, freight, packaging and GST.
What to buy, and what to skip
Five items, in the order you need them, chosen on page statements, price and stock on 29 September 2026. CSI publishes no wick-performance data, so nothing is ranked on burn results. Oil candles are counted at 24 g (300 g fill) and 12 g (150 g).
| Pack | Price | Per unit | What it covers here |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pack of 5 | ₹250.00 | ₹50.00 | the four comparison jars plus one spare, if the hole pitch fits |
| Pack of 10 | ₹500.00 | ₹50.00 | a full production pour of ten |
| Pack of 25 | ₹1,250.00 | ₹50.00 | production batches; no saving per holder |
| Pack | Price | Per unit | What it covers here |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 sheet · 40 stickers (10 mm) | ₹100.00 | ₹2.50 | eight tabs for four pairs, 32 spare |
| 1 sheet · 100 stickers | ₹236.00 — Out of stock | ₹2.36 | Out of stock on 29 September 2026 |
| Pack | Price | Per unit | What it covers here |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thin (C1) / 10 | ₹59.00 — Out of stock | ₹5.90 | Out of stock on 29 September 2026 |
| Thin (C1) / 20 | ₹118.00 | ₹5.90 | two C1 pairs, 16 spare |
| Thin (C1) / 50 · 100 · 500 · 1000 | ₹295.00 · ₹590.00 · ₹2,950.00 · ₹5,900.00 | ₹5.90 | production, after full life |
| Thick (C2) / 10 | ₹94.40 | ₹9.44 | two C2 pairs, 6 spare |
| Thick (C2) / 20 · 50 · 100 · 500 · 1000 | ₹188.80 · ₹472.00 · ₹944.00 · ₹4,720.00 · ₹9,440.00 | ₹9.44 | production, if the C2 pair wins |
| Size | Price | Per gram | 300 g candles at 8% (24 g) | 150 g candles at 8% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 g | ₹94.40 | ₹6.29 | none (under 24 g) | 1 |
| 50 g | ₹212.40 | ₹4.25 | 2 | 4 |
| 100 g | ₹342.20 | ₹3.42 | 4 | 8 |
| 500 g | ₹1,593.00 | ₹3.19 | 20 | 41 |
| 1 kg | ₹3,068.00 | ₹3.07 | 41 | 83 |
| Pack | Price | Per unit | What it covers here |
|---|---|---|---|
| 40 Wick Stickers | ₹249.00 | ₹6.22 | only if a 10 mm sticker won't hold your tab |
Skip: the Wick Centering Device for this job; its page describes one "Hole Dia 0,15" (4mm)", made for a single wick. Skip Cotton Braided; this page is about placing a pair, and a single is a different build. Skip CSI's Apothecary Glass Candle Jar with Dome Lid as a stand-in: it states about 10 cm, not 9, so setting up in it tells you nothing about your jar. And skip bigger wick packs until a pair passes its full life; per-wick prices are the same in every pack.
CandleMakingSuppliesIndia sells the holders, stickers, wicks, oil and wax named here, and does not sell finished candles. This page still says a card bar does the holder's job for a small test, that our holder's hole pitch isn't stated and may not match your spacing, and that our range has no sized, tabbed wick between C1 and C2.
Every price was verified on CSI's live store on 29 September 2026. Stock was checked per size: the Eco C1 10-pack and the 100-sticker sheet are out of stock on that date and are flagged wherever they appear; every other size shown is in stock. Holder, sticker, wick and load wording is quoted from the product pages; where a page is silent or contradicts itself in the text we captured, we say so.
The spacing rules are geometry; choosing the halfway rule, the 2 mm tolerance and the reading of the comparison are our judgement; the 0.35 cm wall, 300 g fill, 90 mm height, 6 mm base and 63 mm fill line are worked-example inputs. CSI publishes no wick-performance data. For bulk pricing, GST invoicing, and MSDS and IFRA documentation on request, message us on WhatsApp at +91 7397976926.
Frequently asked questions
- I’m Using an 8.5 cm Jar with Soy Wax and One Cotton Wick — The Centre Melts Well but a Thick Wax Ring Remains; Should I Wick Up or Consider Double Wicking?
- My Two Wicks Are Too Close Together and Create One Extremely Hot Central Melt Pool — Can Spacing Alone Fix the Problem?
- My Double Wicks Are Too Close to the Glass and the Sides Become Very Hot — How Should Wick Placement Balance Edge Melting and Container Temperature?
- I’m Using Two Wicks in an 8.5 cm Jar but a Strip of Unmelted Wax Remains Between Them — Should the Wicks Be Repositioned Rather than Increased in Size?
- My Double-Wick Candle Melts the Centre but Leaves Wax Along the Outside Edge — How Do I Know Whether Wick Spacing or Wick Size Is Responsible?
- I’m Using a 9 cm Jar with 10% Oud Fragrance — Should I Start Testing with One Large Wick or Two Smaller Wicks?
- My 9 cm Candle Has Two Good Flames but the Melt Pool Becomes Very Deep After Three Hours — How Do I Correct It Without Losing Full-Width Melting?
- My Three-Wick Candle Creates Too Much Heat in the Centre Even Though Each Individual Wick Is Small — Are the Wicks Positioned Too Close Together?
Customer reviews: The six reviews at the top of this page are genuine, published Judge.me reviews left by CSI customers on the product pages named on each card — British Rose Fragrance Oil, Clear Glass Jar with Golden Lid (150 gram), Eco Candle Wicks, Luxury Soy Wax CSI 464 (Flakes Form) For Container Candles, Luxury Soy Wax Chunks for Jar / Container Candles. They are general product reviews, not assessments of the wick advice on this page. Names, star ratings, dates and products are as recorded by Judge.me and wording is unedited. "Verified buyer" appears only on reviews Judge.me recorded as verified — Monika Deep, Arshad Shaikh, Thenirvaofficial, Kaushiki Satarkar, Soumili Gope. The reviews from Ashwini are published but not recorded as verified, and carry no badge. Reviews below five stars are included as published, not filtered out.
Figures verified 29 September 2026, CSI live pricing: Steel Wick Holder (Set of 5) Pack of 5 ₹250.00, 10 ₹500.00, 25 ₹1,250.00; Candle Wick Stickers 40 ₹100.00, 100 ₹236.00 (out of stock); Large Candle Wick Stickers 40 ₹249.00; Wick Setting Tool ₹399.00; Wick Centering Device (Pack of 5) ₹118.00; Eco Candle Wicks Thin (C1) 10 ₹59.00 (out of stock), 20 ₹118.00, 50 ₹295.00, 100 ₹590.00, 500 ₹2,950.00, 1,000 ₹5,900.00; Thick (C2) 10 ₹94.40, 20 ₹188.80, 50 ₹472.00, 100 ₹944.00, 500 ₹4,720.00, 1,000 ₹9,440.00; British Rose Fragrance Oil 15 g ₹94.40 (₹6.29/g), 50 g ₹212.40 (₹4.25/g), 100 g ₹342.20 (₹3.42/g), 500 g ₹1,593.00 (₹3.19/g), 1 kg ₹3,068.00 (₹3.07/g); Luxury Soy Wax CSI 464 500 g ₹260.00, 1 kg ₹507.40; Cotton Braided Wicks Ready Made 10 ₹120.00; Apothecary Glass Candle Jar with Dome Lid 500 gm ₹212.40, 700 gm ₹250.00. Every other size listed is in stock on 29 September 2026. Per unit = price ÷ grams or units, two decimals.
Non-price figures: load is a percentage of total candle weight (300 g at 8% = 24 g oil + 276 g wax; the standard 150 g candle at 8% = 12 g). The 9 cm outside, 0.35 cm wall, 300 g fill, 90 mm jar height, 6 mm base and 4.2 cm working spacing are worked-example inputs; the 6.3 cm fill height uses a commonly cited 0.86–0.9 wax-to-water weight rule of thumb (0.88 used) and is rough. Pool area = π r² on the inside radius; wick-to-wall along the line = r − s/2; to the walls at right angles = √(r² + (s/2)²); a half-disc's centroid is 4r/(3π) from the centre. The 2 mm tolerance is editorial judgement. Ceilings are as the pages state (CSI 464 up to 10%, pour 80–90°C; British Rose up to 10% in soy): formulation limits, not regulatory ones. Session length (about an hour per 2.5 cm) and depth (about 0.5–1 cm) are commonly cited rules of thumb. Costs exclude labour, freight, packaging and GST. Diwali 8 November 2026 is a calendar fact.