My Candle Jar Holds 200 ml but Has a 7 cm Internal Diameter — Which Measurement Should I Use When Choosing the Wick?
Share
Why doesn't the ml figure help? Millilitres are area × depth. Three straight jars can all hold 200 ml with pools of 28.27, 38.48 and 50.27 cm². Depth decides how many hours the candle lasts, not how wide the pool must be.
So what wick for a 7 cm-inside jar? Nobody can honestly tell you one size from the diameter alone: your wax, oil, load and fill change the answer. Bracket three: for example C1, C2 and Cotton Braided as rungs to test. Burn each for 3 to 4 hours and keep the one whose pool reaches the glass about 0.5 to 1 cm deep with a steady flame.
How do I measure the inside diameter? Callipers across the inside at pool height; or a steel ruler across the inside against a card; or the outside minus two wall thicknesses. Check it with water: 50 g of water in a straight 7 cm-inside jar rises about 1.3 cm.
- Straight answer: ml or diameter?
- The wick melts a circle, not a volume
- Which diameter: the one at pool height
- Four ways to measure the inside diameter
- What CSI jar listings state, and what they don't
- From diameter to a bracket, not a wick size
- What to buy for a 7 cm bracket
- A costed bracket, and what skipping it risks
- Frequently asked questions
The wick melts a circle, not a volume
Think about what a wick does in one burn. The flame melts the wax around it, the liquid pool widens, and within a few hours it should reach the wall all the way round. The flame never has to "reach" the bottom of the jar in one sitting; it works down session by session, a few millimetres of pool at a time. So the size of the job, per burn, is the area of the circle the pool must cover. That area is set by the inside diameter at the level where the pool is: π × r².
Capacity in ml is that area multiplied by the height of wax. Double the height and you double the ml without changing the circle at all. That is why ml is the wrong input for a wick. It describes how much candle there is to burn, and says nothing about how wide each burn must melt.
| Inside diameter | Pool area (π × r²) | vs 7 cm | Depth that holds 200 ml | What changes for the wick |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.0 cm | 28.27 cm² | 26.5% less | 7.07 cm | Smaller circle to melt; the rung that suits 7 cm may run hot and deep here |
| 7.0 cm | 38.48 cm² | — | 5.20 cm | Your jar: bracket around this |
| 8.0 cm | 50.27 cm² | 30.6% more | 3.98 cm | A third more wax to melt per burn; the 7 cm winner may tunnel |
If your jar really holds 200 ml to the brim and really measures 7 cm inside, it is about 5.20 cm deep inside, a fairly short, wide jar. Fill it to 1 cm below the rim and it takes about 161.6 g of water, which by the 0.86 to 0.9 rule of thumb is a candle of roughly 139 to 145 g. That fill weight matters for your wax order and label. It does not move the wick decision by a millimetre. Why two jars of equal capacity diverge is worked through in the same-capacity, different-diameter post; why equal wax in a tall and a short jar needs different wicks is the tall-versus-wide explainer.
What height does change
Height is not irrelevant; it just answers different questions. A taller column of wax burns for more sessions. The flame also sits deeper inside the glass as the candle burns down, where there is less air movement and the glass has been warming for hours, so the last third can burn hotter and with a different flame than the first. That is a reason to run the full burn-down on your chosen wick, not a reason to choose the wick by height. It is also why a thick glass base, which makes the jar look taller than its wax column, deserves its own check in the thick-base post.
Which diameter: the one at pool height
For a perfectly straight-sided jar, the inside diameter is the same from the fill line to the floor, and any measurement below the rim will do. Many jars are not like that. Lug-cap and salsa-style jars commonly have a narrowed neck and a shoulder; apothecary shapes curve; some tumblers taper; heavy jars have a thick base that lifts the floor. In each case, the diameter that matters is the inside diameter at the level of the wax surface, because that is where the pool forms.
For the first burns, that is the fill line, or 0.5 to 1 cm below it (where the pool sits once it has settled). If the jar keeps the same diameter all the way down, you are done. If it narrows, widens or curves, you need the diameter at two or three heights and a decision about which one governs. That decision, and the checkpoints to watch as the pool descends, has its own guides: the jar that narrows toward the bottom for the choice, and the jar that is wider at the top for how the pool behaves as it burns down.
| Jar shape | Measure the inside at | Governs the bracket | Also check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Straight-sided tumbler | 1 cm below the fill line | That one reading | A second reading near the floor, to confirm it really is straight |
| Shoulder or narrow neck (lug-cap, salsa) | The body just below the shoulder, where the wax surface sits | The body, not the mouth | That the fill line sits below the shoulder; a pool trapped in the neck behaves differently |
| Narrows toward the base | Top, middle and near the floor | Usually the widest the pool must reach in early burns | Late burns in the narrow part: flame and glass heat |
| Wider in the middle (curved) | Fill line and widest point | Test both; the belly is where tunnelling starts | Whether the pool reaches the belly's wall |
| Thick glass base | As its sidewall shape dictates | Sidewall diameter | Your real wax depth: listed height minus the base |
Four ways to measure the inside diameter
You do not need a lab. You need one of three measuring methods and a water check to confirm it. Measure three jars from the same batch, because mass-produced glass varies, and write down the smallest and largest readings as well as the average.
| Inside diameter | Area | Rise for 50 g of water | Reads as |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6.0 cm | 28.27 cm² | 1.77 cm | A narrow tumbler |
| 6.5 cm | 33.18 cm² | 1.51 cm | What a jar listed "7 cm" might measure inside if that is the outside |
| 7.0 cm | 38.48 cm² | 1.30 cm | Your jar, if the 7 cm is right |
| 7.5 cm | 44.18 cm² | 1.13 cm | 14.8% more pool than 7 cm |
| 8.0 cm | 50.27 cm² | 0.99 cm | 30.6% more pool than 7 cm |
The rise differences are small (a few millimetres between rows), so measure the rise with a ruler held against the outside of a clear jar, or with a marked skewer inside an opaque one. If the water check and the ruler disagree by more than a couple of millimetres of diameter, the jar is probably not straight in that band. Go back to step 1 and measure at two more heights. For opaque or coloured glass, the water-rise check is often the more reliable of the two, because you cannot see the inside wall to line up a ruler.
What CSI jar listings state, and what they don't
Of CSI's 72 container listings, 21 state some diameter and 20 give only a "width". None states an internal diameter. Here are the ones you are most likely to wick, quoted as written, verified 26 September 2026.
| Listing | Size wording | Dimension wording | What is ambiguous for a wick |
|---|---|---|---|
| White Matte Glass Jar and in-stock matte, glossy and frosted sisters | "a fill weight of 200 ml" | "Height 8 cm width 7 cm" | "Width" may be the outside; no wall figure |
| Clear Glass Jar with Golden Lid (150 gram) | "150g fill capacity" | "outer diameter 7cm", "base diameter approximately 6.5cm" | Outside figures only; the page calls the shape both "curved" and "straight-sided" |
| Apothecary Glass Candle Jar with Dome Lid (500 gm / 700 gm) | "~500 g - 700 g (2 sizes)" | "Diameter (outer rim): Approx. 10 cm" | One set of dimensions for two sizes; described as "thick-walled" |
| Black Shiny Glass Jar with Golden Lid and sisters | "Capacity: 120 gm" | "6 cm diameter, 6.5 cm height" | Diameter not stated as outside or inside |
| Shot Glass Jar 130gram | "Fill Capacity - 130gram" | "Diameter - 6cm" | As above; title says pack of 6, handle says 5 |
| Green Iridescent jar with bamboo lid - 300g | "Capacity - 300g" | "Diameter - 7cm" | As above; the same "7 cm" as the Matte family on a taller, larger jar |
Look at the last row. The Matte family and the Green Iridescent jar both carry "7 cm" and hold 200 ml and 300 g respectively. If both really are about the same width, they are candidates for the same wick bracket despite the capacity difference, because height, not width, makes the second jar bigger. That is only a hypothesis until you measure both insides; if it holds, it is the logic behind standardising wicks through diameter.
Now the arithmetic that should make you measure. Suppose the Matte jar's 7 cm is the outside and its walls are about 3.5 mm (our assumption; CSI publishes no wall thickness). The inside is then about 6.3 cm and the pool 31.17 cm², 19% less than a true 7 cm-inside jar at 38.48 cm². A wick bracketed for "7 cm" from the listing is bracketed for a pool nearly a quarter larger than the one you poured. Outside versus inside is taken apart properly in the external-diameter post; how much a few millimetres can move a pool is in the 5 mm post.
From diameter to a bracket, not a wick size
Wick makers commonly publish sizing guides by diameter because diameter is a strong single predictor. It still is not enough to pick one wick, because the same diameter behaves differently with different waxes (soy blends melt differently from paraffin), different oils and loads (heavier or higher loads can make the same wick behave smaller or larger; see the fragrance-load post), different fill depths and even different jar colours. Even CSI's own oil pages say so: the Verbena page tells you to "test wick size based on container diameter". The honest method is to use the diameter to place a bracket, then let the burn choose.
The rungs CSI actually sells
| Wick | What the page states | Per wick | Where it sits in a bracket |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eco Candle Wicks, Thin (C1) | natural fibres, "pair perfectly with soy wax"; no diameter stated | ₹5.90 | Lower rung for small and medium jars |
| Eco Candle Wicks, Thick (C2) | as C1; no diameter stated | ₹9.44 | Middle rung for a 7 cm-class jar in many soy set-ups |
| Cotton Braided Wicks Ready Made | "engineered for large-diameter candles exceeding 8 cm" | ₹12.00 | Top rung for 7 cm; middle rung for wider jars |
| Performance Wooden Wicks | "made from thin strips of wood"; no width options listed | ₹59.00 (pack of 10) | A different family: test as its own rung, not a step between cotton sizes |
For a 7 cm-inside jar in a container soy such as Luxury Soy Wax CSI 464, a sensible first bracket is C1 / C2 / Cotton Braided: the thin rung that will probably under-melt, the middle that might be right, and the heavy rung that will probably over-melt. That spacing is the point. If the thin rung wins, you have learned your oil and load burn hot; if the heavy one wins, they burn cool; if the middle wins, you have evidence on both sides. How to choose three rungs for a straight 3-inch (about 7.6 cm) jar in more depth is the first-three-wicks post; when a wide jar should jump to two wicks is the 4-inch luxury jar post.
How to read the first burn
Light all rungs at once, side by side, in still air, after the cure your oil page states (the Sandalwood Fragrance Oil page, for example, says "Up to 10% for soy wax, with a cure time of 48-72 hours"). Log the pool every hour. The rules of thumb below are commonly used by candle makers; they are starting points, and yours will shift with wax and oil.
| At hour 3 to 4 | Likely meaning | Next move |
|---|---|---|
| Solid ring of wax on the glass; pool less than about 0.5 cm deep | Under-wicked for this diameter, wax and oil | Drop this rung; test the next rung up |
| Pool reaches the glass all round; about 0.5 to 1 cm deep; flame steady | In range | Shortlist; take it through a full burn-down |
| Pool at the glass before hour 2; deeper than about 1.5 cm; tall or flickering flame, soot | Over-wicked | Drop this rung; the one below is your ceiling |
| Pool lopsided: reaches one side early, lags on the other | Wick off-centre or a draught, not a size result | Re-pour with a centred wick before judging |
A very rough rule some makers use is about one hour of burn per 2.5 cm of jar width for a full pool; for 7 cm that is about 2.8 hours, which sits inside the common 3-to-4-hour window. Do not stop at the first burn. The shortlisted wick must then burn down the whole jar, in sessions of 3 to 4 hours, with the glass checked in the final third and the burn stopped with roughly 1 cm of wax left (common practice). A wick that is perfect at the top can run hot at the bottom, which is where the thick-base post and the glass-safety cluster take over.
What to buy for a 7 cm bracket
Five items, chosen on what their pages state, price and stock on 26 September 2026. We have no burn data for any of them in your jar, which is the whole reason for the bracket.
| Pack | Price | Per wick | What it covers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thin (C1) / 10 Wicks | ₹59.00 | ₹5.90 | three bracket jars with spares |
| Thin (C1) / 20 Wicks | ₹118.00 | ₹5.90 | two jar designs, bracketed |
| Thin (C1) / 50 Wicks | ₹295.00 | ₹5.90 | a 50-candle run once this rung wins |
| Thin (C1) / 100 Wicks | ₹590.00 | ₹5.90 | a 100-candle run |
| Thin (C1) / 500 Wicks | ₹2,950.00 | ₹5.90 | a season of one approved jar |
| Thin (C1) / 1000 Wicks | ₹5,900.00 | ₹5.90 | bulk: ask about dispatch first |
| Thick (C2) / 10 Wicks | ₹94.40 | ₹9.44 | three bracket jars with spares |
| Thick (C2) / 20 Wicks | ₹188.80 | ₹9.44 | two jar designs, bracketed |
| Thick (C2) / 50 Wicks | ₹472.00 | ₹9.44 | a 50-candle run once this rung wins |
| Thick (C2) / 100 Wicks | ₹944.00 | ₹9.44 | a 100-candle run |
| Thick (C2) / 500 Wicks | ₹4,720.00 | ₹9.44 | a season of one approved jar |
| Thick (C2) / 1000 Wicks | ₹9,440.00 | ₹9.44 | bulk: ask about dispatch first |
| Pack | Price | Per wick | What it covers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pack of 10 | ₹120.00 | ₹12.00 | the top rung of a 7 cm bracket |
| Pack of 50 | ₹600.00 | ₹12.00 | a 50-candle run if it wins |
| Pack of 100 | ₹1,200.00 | ₹12.00 | a 100-candle run |
| Pack of 500 | ₹6,000.00 | ₹12.00 | a season of one design |
| Pack of 1000 | ₹12,000.00 | ₹12.00 | bulk production |
| Pack | Price | Per jar | What it covers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pack of 5 | ₹354.00 | ₹70.80 | one water-rise check plus a two-rung bracket, two jars each |
| Pack of 10 | ₹708.00 | ₹70.80 | a full three-rung bracket, three jars each, plus one to measure |
| Pack | Price | Per holder | What it covers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pack of 5 | ₹118.00 | ₹23.60 | one rung of three jars, reused for every pour |
| Unit | Price | Per unit | What it covers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single | ₹354.00 | ₹354.00 | water-rise checks, fill weights and every wax and oil weighing |
A costed bracket, and what skipping it risks
Worked example: three rungs × three jars = nine candles, 150 g each at 8% (12 g oil + 138 g wax; 150 g is the series planning figure for the 200 ml Matte family, so weigh your own jar's fill). Prices are CSI live pricing on 26 September 2026; costs exclude labour, freight, packaging and GST.
| Item | Needed | Buy | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| White Matte Glass Jar (or your own jar) | 9 poured + 1 to measure | Pack of 10 | ₹708.00 |
| Luxury Soy Wax CSI 464 | 1,242 g (9 × 138 g) | 1 kg + 500 g | ₹767.40 |
| Sandalwood Fragrance Oil (costing example; use your production oil) | 108 g (9 × 12 g) | 100 g + 15 g | ₹595.90 |
| Eco C1 + Eco C2 + Cotton Braided | 3 of each | 10 of each | ₹273.40 |
| Wick Centering Device | 3 per pour, reused | Pack of 5 | ₹118.00 |
| Total | 9 candles | 258 g wax, 7 g oil and 21 wicks spare | ₹2,462.70 |
With your own jars the kit is ₹1,754.70; with your own jars, oil and centering sticks it is ₹1,040.80. Sandalwood is only a costing example: its page states "Recommended load up to 10% for soy, up to 6% for paraffin", every size in stock on 26 September 2026. CSI 464's page states up to 10%, so 8% sits inside both ceilings; test at your own production load, not ours. Seven Sandalwood grams spare is not enough for a retest, so buy a second 15 g (₹93.22) if a rung needs re-pouring.
What the wrong wick costs at 100 candles
One finished candle in this worked example is a Matte jar ₹70.80 + 138 g of CSI 464 at the 10 kg price ₹70.02 + 12 g of Sandalwood at the 1 kg price ₹60.32 + a C2 wick ₹9.44 = ₹210.58 in materials. A hundred of them is ₹21,058.28, 8.6 times the bracket kit. If they tunnel because the wick was picked for "200 ml", you cannot re-wick a poured candle; you melt out, clean the jars and start again, or sell a candle that leaves a wall of unburnt wax.
Now the other direction. Suppose the bracket says Cotton Braided rather than C1. That wick costs ₹6.10 more per candle, ₹610.00 over 100 candles. A C2 instead of a C1 is ₹3.54 more per candle. The wick is the cheapest line on the bill; buying the right one is never the expensive part. Choosing by the wrong measurement is.
CandleMakingSuppliesIndia sells the wicks, jars, wax and tools named here and does not sell finished candles. This page tells you that none of our 72 container listings states an internal diameter, that our 200 ml Matte jar's "width 7 cm" may be the outside, and that you should buy wicks ten at a time until a burn test has chosen one. That is deliberate: a maker who brackets first reorders the right wick.
Every price and per-wick figure was verified on CSI's live store on 26 September 2026; every pack in a pick table was in stock that day, and out-of-stock jar colours are named as such. Wick and jar wording is quoted from the product pages; where a page is silent, we say so.
Pool areas are plain geometry (π × r²) on stated inside diameters. The 3-to-4-hour first burn, 0.5-to-1 cm pool depth, one hour per 2.5 cm of width, 1 cm stop line and 0.86-to-0.9 wax factor are candle-maker rules of thumb. The 0.35 cm wall, the rung order and the bracket plan are editorial judgement. For bulk pricing, GST invoicing, and MSDS and IFRA documentation on request, message us on WhatsApp at +91 7397976926.
Frequently asked questions
- I'm Using the Same Amount of Wax in a Tall Narrow Jar and a Short Wide Jar — Why Do They Need Different Wick Sizes?
- I'm Changing to a Wider Candle Jar but Keeping the Same Soy Wax and Fragrance — How Much Should I Adjust My Starting Wick Size?
- My Jar Narrows Toward the Bottom — Should I Select the Wick Based on the Top, Middle or Bottom Internal Diameter?
- My Candle Jar Is Wider at the Top Than the Bottom — How Does That Affect Burn Testing as the Candle Burns Down?
- I Have a Straight-Sided 3-Inch Candle Jar — How Do I Choose the First Three Wick Sizes to Test Rather Than Guessing Randomly?
- I'm Buying a 4-Inch-Wide Luxury Candle Jar — Should I Plan for One Wick, Two Wicks or Three Before Ordering Production Quantities?
- Two Glass Jars Have the Same Capacity but Different Diameters — Can I Use the Same Wick If the Wax and Fragrance Stay Identical?
- I Already Finalised My Wick for a 7 cm Jar — If My New Jar Is 8 cm Wide, Do I Have to Repeat the Entire Burn-Testing Process?
- I Want to Standardise One Wick Across Multiple Candle Jars — How Similar Do Their Internal Diameters Need to Be?
- The Supplier Gives the External Diameter of the Candle Jar — Can I Use That for Wick Selection or Do I Need the Internal Diameter?
- How Much Can a 5 mm Difference in Candle Jar Diameter Affect the Wick Size and Melt Pool?
- I'm Ordering 500 Jars for a New Candle Line — Should I Finalise the Wick Before Committing to the Full Jar Order?
Customer reviews: The six reviews at the top of this page are genuine, published Judge.me reviews left by CSI customers on the product pages named on each card — Bamboo Wick Holder, Black Matte Glass Jar, Clear Glass Jar with Golden Lid (150 gram), Eco Candle Wicks, Luxury Soy Wax CSI 464 (Flakes Form) For Container Candles. They are general product reviews, not assessments of the container advice on this page. Names, star ratings, dates and products are as recorded by Judge.me and wording is unedited. "Verified buyer" appears only on reviews Judge.me recorded as verified — Monika Deep, Soumili Gope, Tina Lynette Lazaro Moganti, Thenirvaofficial. The reviews from Ashwini, Lalitha Jagan are published but not recorded as verified, and carry no badge. Reviews below five stars are included as published, not filtered out.
Figures verified 26 September 2026, CSI live pricing: Eco Candle Wicks Thin (C1) 10 ₹59.00, 20 ₹118.00, 50 ₹295.00, 100 ₹590.00, 500 ₹2,950.00, 1000 ₹5,900.00 (₹5.90 per wick); Thick (C2) 10 ₹94.40, 20 ₹188.80, 50 ₹472.00, 100 ₹944.00, 500 ₹4,720.00, 1000 ₹9,440.00 (₹9.44 per wick); Cotton Braided Wicks Ready Made 10 ₹120.00, 50 ₹600.00, 100 ₹1,200.00, 500 ₹6,000.00, 1000 ₹12,000.00 (₹12.00 per wick); Performance Wooden Wicks 10 ₹590.00, 50 ₹2,360.00, 100 ₹4,130.00; White Matte Glass Jar Pack of 5 ₹354.00, Pack of 10 ₹708.00 (₹70.80 per jar); Wick Centering Device (Pack of 5) ₹118.00; Candle Making Weighing Scale ₹354.00; Luxury Soy Wax CSI 464 500 g ₹260.00, 1 kg ₹507.40, 10 kg ₹5,074.00; Sandalwood Fragrance Oil 15 g ₹93.22, 100 g ₹502.68, 1 kg ₹5,026.80 (₹5.03 per gram at 1 kg). Per wick and per jar = pack price ÷ units; two decimals.
Non-price figures: pool area = π × r² on inside diameters (6.0 cm 28.27 cm², 6.3 cm 31.17 cm², 7.0 cm 38.48 cm², 7.5 cm 44.18 cm², 8.0 cm 50.27 cm²); 1 g of water ≈ 1 cm³. The 3-to-4-hour first burn, 0.5-to-1 cm pool depth, one hour per 2.5 cm of width, the 1 cm stop line and the 0.86-to-0.9 wax factor are rules of thumb. The 0.35 cm wall of the Matte worked example is an assumption; CSI publishes no wall thickness. Test candles are 150 g at 8% (12 g oil + 138 g wax, load on total weight). Wax and oil ceilings are as stated on their pages (formulation limits, not regulatory limits). Diwali is a calendar date; the bracket timing is a worked plan, not a delivery promise. Costs exclude labour, freight, packaging and GST.