How Do I Create Incoming QC for Fragrance Oils Covering Appearance, Odour, Viscosity Observations, Candle Compatibility, Hot Throw, Discolouration and Burn Behaviour?
Aktie
Can I include viscosity if the supplier does not publish it? You can include a flow observation against your own reference at the same temperature. It is comparative, not a measured viscosity, and the spec should say so.
Do I need a candle test on every delivery? Not always. Quick checks on every delivery; candle-based checks on the first delivery, on any deviation, and for bestsellers or pale-wax products.
Who sets the acceptance criteria? You do, based on your approved candle. Treat early criteria as suggested starting points and revise them as deliveries build a history.
What a specification is, and what it is not
An incoming specification is the written version of the decisions you make at goods-in. It says what you check, how you check it, what counts as a pass, and how often each check is done. It exists so that the same delivery gets the same decision whoever receives it, and so that when something goes wrong, you can see which check should have caught it.
It is not a copy of the supplier's data sheet, and it should not pretend to precision you do not have. CSI does not publish certificates of analysis, lot numbers, viscosity, specific gravity, refractive index or colour specifications for its fragrance oils, and many suppliers serving smaller makers are similar. Your spec therefore leans on comparison: against a retained reference, under matched conditions, with a written description of what a pass looks like.
This page is about the document itself. It assumes you already have an approved candle and a retained reference for the oil, and it shows how to turn those into a one-page specification.
The header: fixing the reference points
Every line in the specification is judged against something, so the header fixes those reference points before any parameter appears.
The nine parameters, line by line
The table below is an example specification. The criteria and frequencies are suggested starting points to adapt and validate, not a standard and not CSI policy.
| Parameter | Method | Acceptance criterion (suggested) | Frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Identity and documents | Check label against invoice and spec header; confirm IFRA and MSDS on file | Name matches; documents held | Every delivery |
| 2. Packaging and quantity | Inspect seals and caps; weigh containers | Seals intact, no leaks, weights consistent with pack size | Every delivery |
| 3. Colour and clarity | Pour into clear glass beside the reference at the same temperature, same light | No clear colour difference; no haze, specks or layers | Every delivery |
| 4. Odour | Coded strips, oil vs reference, assessed at 0, 15 and 60 minutes | No reliably detectable difference in odd-one-out rounds | Every delivery |
| 5. Flow observation | Pour or pipette equal amounts side by side at the same temperature and compare how they run | No obvious difference from reference; comparative only | Every delivery |
| 6. Wax compatibility | Pour a small test in your approved wax and load; inspect after cure for sweating, separation or mottling | Same appearance as approval candle at the same age | First delivery; on any deviation in lines 3–5 |
| 7. Hot throw | Burn a confirmation candle beside the reference candle in the same room | Comparable strength and character | First delivery; bestsellers each delivery; on deviation |
| 8. Discolouration | Scented candle and unscented control from the same wax, kept together in the same light; compare at set ages | Tone within what the approval candle showed at the same age | First delivery; pale-wax products each delivery |
| 9. Burn behaviour | Observe flame, carbon build-up and melt pool at set time points during the confirmation burn | Comparable to reference; no smoking or flaring | With line 7 |
Two lines deserve comment. Line 5 records a flow observation rather than a viscosity, because without a published figure or a viscometer you are only comparing two liquids at the same temperature. Write that plainly in the spec so nobody later mistakes it for a measurement. Line 8 uses an unscented control so that you can separate what the oil does to the wax colour from what the wax does on its own.
Recording results against the spec
Give each delivery a goods-in sheet that repeats the nine line numbers down the side, with a column for the result, one for initials and one for notes. A line that was not checked is marked as not checked, with the reason, rather than left blank. That small discipline is what lets you look back later and see whether a problem slipped through because a check failed or because it was never done. File the sheet with the invoice and the spec version that applied on the day.
Worked example: a spec for Gardenia
Gardenia, listed as Gardenia Tuberose, is a good test case because its product page publishes details the spec must honour. The flashpoint is given as 98°C and the page says to add the oil below 98°C. Vanillin is given as 0.2%, and the page states up to 10% in soy, up to 6% in paraffin, and 8–10% for luxury jars.
The header records those facts and nothing more. The approved recipe might be 8% in CSI 464 in a 200 ml matte jar with a thin eco wick, with the add temperature written into the method as below 98°C and the actual temperature recorded each time. That single instruction is the most important safety line in this oil's spec, and it only exists because the page published the figure.
For the quick checks, line 6 can be screened with a wax melt before any candle is poured. Wax melt clamshells cost ₹295.00 for a pack of 10, so one is ₹295.00 ÷ 10 = ₹29.50, and a small melt shows early whether the new delivery binds and throws like the old one. It does not replace the candle for lines 7 to 9. A confirmation candle at 8% of 200 g takes 16 g of oil; at ₹4,332.00 per kilogram, that is ₹4,332.00 ÷ 1,000 = ₹4.332 per gram, so 16 × ₹4.332 = ₹69.31 of oil.
For line 8, the low published vanillin suggests little discolouration from that source, but the spec still asks for the scented and unscented pair on the first delivery, because other materials can affect colour and because the page's figure describes the product, not your delivery.
| Check group | Lines | When | Typical effort |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quick checks | 1–5 | Every delivery | Under an hour, no candle |
| Screening melt | 6 (screen) | Every delivery where lines 3–5 raise a doubt | One clamshell; ₹29.50 each |
| Candle checks | 6–9 | First delivery; on deviation; bestseller deliveries | Confirmation candle plus control; cure and burn time |
Keeping the spec honest over time
A specification is a living document. After each delivery, note whether the checks were proportionate. If an oil passes cleanly every time, you may reduce candle checks to a set interval. If borderline results keep appearing, tighten the method, add a second assessor for strips, or make the confirmation candle routine. Change the version number and date whenever you change a criterion or frequency, and keep old versions so you know which rules applied to which delivery.
Update the header whenever the supplier tells you something new, and record the date and wording of their answer. If a supplier confirms a change to the oil, treat it as a new approval and start the spec again from a new reference.
Hold the spec to the same standard whoever supplies the oil. A delivery that fails a line stays in quarantine until the reason is understood, including when the supplier is us. And do not add lines that you will not actually check. A short spec that is followed every time is worth more than a long one that is skipped when the workshop is busy.
Where this page fits
CSI already has guides that cover parts of this question. This page covers the goods-in check for the question above; these go deeper on the rest:
Three things to buy for this job
| Option | Price | Status on the September 2026 pull |
|---|---|---|
| 15 g | ₹105.02 | In stock |
| 50 g | ₹223.02 | In stock |
| 100 g | ₹433.00 | In stock |
| 500 g | ₹2,166.00 | In stock |
| 1 kg | ₹4,332.00 | In stock |
| Option | Price | Status on the September 2026 pull |
|---|---|---|
| Pack of 5 | ₹147.50 | In stock |
| Pack of 10 | ₹295.00 | In stock |
| Pack of 50 | ₹1,475.00 | In stock |
| Pack of 100 | ₹2,950.00 | In stock |
| Option | Price | Status on the September 2026 pull |
|---|---|---|
| Pen thermometer | ₹354.00 | In stock |
CANDLEMAKINGSUPPLIESINDIA supplies raw materials and production equipment, not finished candles. This guide separates general quality-control practice from what CSI's own product pages state, says plainly what CSI does not publish (lot numbers, certificates of analysis, tolerances), and labels every sample size, tolerance or retained quantity as a starting point for your own validation.
Prices are live CSI prices from September 2026; product pages are authoritative. Where a spec is not published — such as a lot number, a jar's internal diameter or a wick's burn rate — this guide says so rather than filling the gap.
For bulk quotes, questions about a specific delivery, GST invoicing, IFRA and MSDS documents, message us on WhatsApp at +91 7397976926.
Frequently asked questions
- I Want to Reduce Failed Fragrance Purchases — What Information Should I Request and What Candle Tests Should I Complete Before Ordering Fragrance Oils in Commercial Quantities?
- My New Fragrance Oil Batch Is Darker Than the Sample I Originally Approved — Does That Automatically Mean Something Is Wrong?
- My New Lavender Fragrance Oil Is Slightly More Yellow Than the Previous Batch — What Should I Test Before Using It in Hundreds of Candles?
- My New Fragrance Oil Is More Viscous Than the Previous Lot — Could That Affect Candle Mixing, Wick Behaviour or Fragrance Performance?
- My New Vanilla Fragrance Is Much Darker Than the Previous Bottle — Should I Run a Discolouration Test Before Producing White Candles?
- My New Fragrance Batch Smells Slightly Different From My Retained Sample — How Do I Determine Whether the Variation Is Commercially Acceptable?
- My Fragrance Oil Smells Correct From the Bottle but Performs Differently in Wax — Should Incoming QC Include an Actual Candle Test?
- My New Coffee Fragrance Has Stronger Cold Throw but Weaker Hot Throw Than the Previous Lot — What Should I Compare Before Approving It?
- My New Oud Fragrance Makes the Wick Mushroom More Than the Previous Batch at the Same 8% Load — Can Fragrance-Lot Variation Affect Combustion?
- How to Tell If a Candle Fragrance Oil Is Good Quality
- Which Candle Fragrances Are Least Likely to Discolour White Wax?
Customer reviews: The reviews at the top are genuine, published Judge.me reviews — Ashwini (5★, not recorded as verified); Tina Lynette Lazaro Moganti (5★, verified); Tina Raha (4★, verified); Arminder Kaur (5★, verified); Lalitha Jagan (5★, not recorded as verified); Arshad Shaikh (5★, verified). Names, ratings, dates and products as recorded by Judge.me.
Product facts (September 2026, CSI live store): Gardenia (listed as Gardenia Tuberose) Fragrance Oil: 15 g ₹105.02, 50 g ₹223.02, 100 g ₹433.00, 500 g ₹2,166.00, 1 kg ₹4,332.00 — flashpoint 98°C · vanillin 0.2% · up to 10% soy, up to 6% paraffin · page: 8–10% for luxury jars · page: add below 98°C. Wax Melts Containers (empty clamshells): Pack of 5 ₹147.50, Pack of 10 ₹295.00, Pack of 50 ₹1,475.00, Pack of 100 ₹2,950.00 — heart or square clamshells. Pen Thermometer: Pen thermometer ₹354.00 — range and accuracy not published.
Assumptions: Fragrance load is a percentage of total candle weight (200 g = 184 g wax + 16 g oil at 8%). CSI product pages do not publish lot numbers, certificates of analysis, tolerances, jar internal diameters, wick dimensions or mould hardness; where this guide needs them, it tells you to measure or ask. Sample sizes, tolerances, retained quantities, test lengths and acceptance rules are suggested starting points to validate, not standards or CSI policy. Hypothetical supplier prices are CSI prices adjusted by the stated percentage and labelled as such. Worked examples are illustrations. Prices and availability change — product pages are authoritative.