My Jar Narrows Toward the Bottom — Should I Select the Wick Based on the Top, Middle or Bottom Internal Diameter?
Aktie
Why not the middle, as a compromise? Because a wick chosen for the middle faces a pool it was not chosen for in the first burns. In our worked example the top pool is 30.6% larger than the mid-jar pool; that gap is the usual start of a tunnel that is hard to recover.
Then what are the middle and bottom for? Checks. As the candle burns into the narrower glass, the same wick has less pool to melt: 23.5% less at mid-jar and 39.0% less at the stop line in our example. Watch pool depth, flame height, soot and the glass there.
What if the bottom fails the check? Try the lowest rung that still fills the top. If that one also runs too hot low down, the jar's taper is the problem, not the wick: raise the stop line, or choose a straighter jar.
- Straight answer: top, middle or bottom?
- Why the top chooses the wick
- Profile the inside: the 20 g water-step method
- How much taper is too much?
- Three checkpoints: what each must show
- CSI's 150 g jar: narrower at the base, on paper
- What to buy for a tapered-jar bracket
- What the bracket costs
- Frequently asked questions
Why the top chooses the wick
Every burn of a container candle leaves a record. When you blow it out, the pool sets, and its edge becomes a line the next burn tends to follow. Candle makers call a pool that stops short of the glass a memory ring. If the first burns leave one, the next burns melt down inside it rather than out to the glass, and the candle tunnels. The first burns happen at the top of the jar. So the pool the wick must win, first and without fail, is the one at the top.
In a jar that narrows toward the bottom, the top is also the widest pool the candle will ever have. Everything below is smaller. That makes the choice asymmetric. A wick sized for the top will, lower down, find its job getting easier; it may run a deeper pool or a taller flame, which you must check, but it will not tunnel. A wick sized for the middle or bottom will find the top too big from the first burn, and the tunnel it starts is hard to undo.
| Chosen for | At the top (first burns) | Mid-jar | Near the stop line | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Top, 50.27 cm² | Pool reaches the glass | Reaches the glass sooner; pool may run deeper | Most heat for least pool: check flame and glass | Default choice; must pass the bottom check |
| Middle, 38.48 cm² | Pool 30.6% bigger than planned: likely ring | About right, if it ever gets here evenly | A little generous | Compromise that fails in the first burns |
| Bottom, 30.68 cm² | Tunnels from the first burn | Tunnel continues | Right size, for a pool that is now a hole | Wrong for any noticeable taper |
"Wick for the top" has two refinements. First, it means the inside diameter at the height the pool sits in the first burns, about 0.5 to 1 cm below your fill line, not the rim. If your jar has a lip or neck above the fill line, ignore it. Second, "usually" matters: a jar that is widest in the middle (a belly or barrel) is a different shape, where the pool must reach the widest point partway down; there, test at the belly as well as the top. For measuring the inside and the logic of pool height, see the diameter-and-wick hub.
Profile the inside: the 20 g water-step method
Callipers or a ruler work at the top. Lower down, and in opaque or coloured glass, they get awkward. The water-step profile gives you the inside diameter at every height with only a scale and a ruler, because 1 g of water is about 1 cm³. Each step of water fills a thin slice of the jar; how far the level rises tells you that slice's area.
| Inside diameter of the slice | Slice area | Rise for 20 g |
|---|---|---|
| 8.0 cm | 50.27 cm² | 0.40 cm |
| 7.5 cm | 44.18 cm² | 0.45 cm |
| 7.0 cm | 38.48 cm² | 0.52 cm |
| 6.5 cm | 33.18 cm² | 0.60 cm |
| 6.0 cm | 28.27 cm² | 0.71 cm |
The differences between rows are a millimetre or so, so read the level at eye height and use the same edge of the meniscus every time. The profile does two jobs at once: the three checkpoint diameters for the wick, and the fill-line water weight for your fill weight, which is the method in the 200 ml fill-weight hub.
How much taper is too much?
Express the taper as the pool area lost from checkpoint 1 (top) to checkpoint 3 (stop line). That single percentage tells you how hard the top-chosen wick will be working at the end, relative to the job it was chosen for. The bands below are our judgement for deciding how closely to watch the bottom; they are not industry thresholds.
| Band | Area lost, top → stop line | Example | How to wick | Bottom check |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mild | up to about 20% | CSI 150 g jar on paper: 31.17 → 26.42 cm², 15.2% less | Bracket against the top as normal | Standard burn-down; rarely changes the choice |
| Moderate | about 20% to 35% | A 7.5 cm top narrowing to about 6.2 cm | Take the lowest rung that fills the top in 3 to 4 hours | Log pool depth and flame height from mid-jar down |
| Strong | above about 35% | Worked example: 50.27 → 30.68 cm², 39.0% less | Lowest adequate rung; never "one up to be safe" | Every session in the bottom third watched; stop line may need raising |
Notice the instruction for moderate and strong tapers: the lowest rung that fills the top. In a straight jar, a slightly generous wick is a small risk. In a narrowing jar it compounds, because the same heat meets less and less pool on the way down. If C1 and C2 both reach the glass at the top within the window, choose C1 and see whether it holds; take C2 only if C1 leaves a ring.
When no rung passes both tests
Sometimes the lowest wick that fills the top is still too much at the bottom: the pool runs deep, the flame climbs, soot appears, or the glass near the flame reads much hotter than at the same stage in your straight jars (measure with a non-contact thermometer (CSI does not sell one), never your hand). Then the wick is not the problem, and changing it will just trade a tunnel for heat. Your honest options are to raise the stop line (stop burns with more wax left and say so on the care label), to fill lower so the candle never burns into the narrowest glass, or to choose a less tapered jar. How a jar that is wider at the top behaves over the whole burn-down, session by session, is the burn-testing post for wider-top jars; heat at the end of a jar is also shaped by a thick base (the thick-base post) and, with two wicks, by the double-wick heat post.
Three checkpoints: what each must show
The checkpoints turn "wick for the top, check the rest" into a pass/fail test. Run them on the shortlisted wick from your bracket, in 3-to-4-hour sessions. (The full session-by-session schedule for a taper, and why heat builds as the pool descends, is the subject of the wider-top burn-testing post; here is what each checkpoint must prove for the selection to stand.)
| Checkpoint | When | Pass | Fail, and what it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Top (fill line) | First burn, 3 to 4 hours | Pool reaches the glass all round, about 0.5 to 1 cm deep, steady flame | Ring of wax: rung too small for the top. Move up one rung |
| 2. Mid-jar | The session when the surface is about halfway down | Pool at the glass early in the session and no deeper than about 1.5 cm; flame steady; no soot | Deep pool, tall flame: the wick is generous for a narrower pool. Note it and continue to 3 |
| 3. Stop line | Final sessions, until about 1 cm of wax remains | Flame steady, no soot, glass temperature (non-contact thermometer, never your hand) similar to your straight-jar candles at the same stage | Flame climbing, soot, glass reading markedly hotter: try the next rung down if it passed 1; otherwise the taper is the problem |
A rough rule some makers use, about one hour per 2.5 cm of width for a full first pool, gives about 3.2 hours for an 8 cm top: inside the 3-to-4-hour window, but at its edge. If your top-chosen wick needs well beyond four hours to reach the glass at checkpoint 1, it is too small, whatever it does lower down.
CSI's 150 g jar: narrower at the base, on paper
The Clear Glass Jar with Golden Lid (150 gram) belongs to the only CSI jar family (this clear jar and its coloured 150 g sisters) whose pages list a base diameter smaller than the rim: "outer rim diameter approximately 7cm" and "base diameter approximately 6.5cm", with "Height 8cm" and "150g fill capacity". On those figures it narrows toward the base. The same page also calls the shape a "curved silhouette" and, elsewhere, a "clean, straight-sided surface". Those cannot all be true of the same profile, and "base diameter" could be the foot, not the body.
If we take the figures at face value, with walls of about 3.5 mm (our assumption), the inside runs from about 6.3 cm at the top to about 5.8 cm near the base: 31.17 → 26.42 cm², 15.2% less pool at the bottom. That is a mild taper: bracket against the top as normal, and the bottom check rarely changes the result. But until you have profiled one, you do not know whether it tapers, curves or runs straight. The coloured versions (Black, Red, Pink, Orange; Amber out of stock on 26 September 2026) list the same "outer rim" and "base" figures, with only the height given with the lid, and some titles still say "Deliveries Starting 5th Dec": confirm dispatch on WhatsApp.
What to buy for a tapered-jar bracket
Five items, chosen on page wording, price and stock on 26 September 2026. CSI has not burn-tested any of them in a tapered jar with your wax and oil.
| Pack | Price | Per jar | What it covers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pack of 10 | ₹944.00 | ₹94.40 | a three-rung bracket, three jars each, plus one to profile |
| Pack of 20 | ₹1,888.00 | ₹94.40 | a bracket plus a retest round |
| Pack | Price | Per wick | What it covers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thin (C1) / 10 Wicks | ₹59.00 | ₹5.90 | three bracket jars and a retest |
| Thin (C1) / 20 Wicks | ₹118.00 | ₹5.90 | two tapered designs |
| Thin (C1) / 50 Wicks | ₹295.00 | ₹5.90 | 50 candles once it wins |
| Thin (C1) / 100 Wicks | ₹590.00 | ₹5.90 | 100 candles |
| Thin (C1) / 500 Wicks | ₹2,950.00 | ₹5.90 | a season of one jar |
| Thin (C1) / 1000 Wicks | ₹5,900.00 | ₹5.90 | bulk: confirm dispatch first |
| Thick (C2) / 10 Wicks | ₹94.40 | ₹9.44 | three bracket jars and a retest |
| Thick (C2) / 20 Wicks | ₹188.80 | ₹9.44 | two tapered designs |
| Thick (C2) / 50 Wicks | ₹472.00 | ₹9.44 | 50 candles once it wins |
| Thick (C2) / 100 Wicks | ₹944.00 | ₹9.44 | 100 candles |
| Thick (C2) / 500 Wicks | ₹4,720.00 | ₹9.44 | a season of one jar |
| Thick (C2) / 1000 Wicks | ₹9,440.00 | ₹9.44 | bulk: confirm dispatch first |
| Pack | Price | Per wick | What it covers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pack of 10 | ₹120.00 | ₹12.00 | the ceiling rung for a 6 to 7 cm top |
| Pack of 50 | ₹600.00 | ₹12.00 | 50 candles if it wins |
| Pack of 100 | ₹1,200.00 | ₹12.00 | 100 candles |
| Pack of 500 | ₹6,000.00 | ₹12.00 | 500 candles |
| Pack of 1000 | ₹12,000.00 | ₹12.00 | bulk production |
| Pack | Price | Per sticker | What it covers |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 sheet - 40 stickers | ₹100.00 | ₹2.50 | four nine-jar brackets |
| 1 sheet - 100 stickers | ₹236.00 | Out of stock | Out of stock on 26 September 2026 |
| Unit | Price | Per unit | What it covers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single | ₹354.00 | ₹354.00 | water-step profiles, fill weights and every weighing |
What the bracket costs
Worked example: C1 / C2 / Cotton Braided × three jars in the Clear 150 g jar, 150 g candles at 8% (12 g oil + 138 g wax). Woody Oud Fragrance Oil is the costing example; its page states "candles (6-10%)" and "Cure soy wax candles for 48-72 hours before burn testing". Prices are CSI live pricing on 26 September 2026; costs exclude labour, freight, packaging and GST.
| Item | Needed | Buy | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clear Glass Jar with Golden Lid (150 gram) | 1 profiled + 9 poured | Pack of 10 | ₹944.00 |
| Luxury Soy Wax CSI 464 | 1,242 g (9 × 138 g) | 1 kg + 500 g | ₹767.40 |
| Woody Oud Fragrance Oil | 108 g (9 × 12 g) | 100 g + 15 g | ₹546.34 |
| Eco C1 + Eco C2 + Cotton Braided | 3 of each | 10 of each | ₹273.40 |
| Candle Wick Stickers | 9 | 1 sheet - 40 stickers | ₹100.00 |
| Total | 9 candles | 258 g wax, 7 g oil, 21 wicks spare | ₹2,631.14 |
With your own jars and anchoring, the wax, oil and wicks cost ₹1,587.14. The profiled jar is dried and poured later as a spare. CSI 464 costs ₹0.52 per gram at 500 g and ₹0.51 at 1 kg and above, and its page states up to 10%, so 8% sits inside both ceilings. Seven grams of oil will not cover a retest; add a 15 g (₹93.22) if a rung needs re-pouring. One finished candle in this jar is ₹94.40 + ₹70.02 of wax + ₹54.37 of Woody Oud at the 1 kg price + a C2 ₹9.44 = ₹228.24 in materials; a hundred is ₹22,823.56. In a strongly tapered jar, a hundred candles wicked for the bottom risk tunnelling together; the bracket is the insurance.
CandleMakingSuppliesIndia sells the jars, wicks, stickers, wax and oil named here and does not sell finished candles. This page tells you that our own 150 g jar listing describes its shape in contradictory ways, that coloured versions cost more and carry stale dispatch text, and that a strongly tapered jar may simply be the wrong jar, possibly not one of ours. That is deliberate.
Every price and per-unit figure was verified on CSI's live store on 26 September 2026; every pack in a pick table was in stock that day except where marked out of stock. Jar, wick and wax wording is quoted from the product pages.
Pool areas are geometry on inside diameters; the 8.0 → 6.0 cm taper and the 0.35 cm walls of the 150 g example are assumptions. The taper bands and checkpoint criteria are editorial judgement; the 3-to-4-hour first burn, 0.5-to-1 cm pool, 1.5 cm deep-pool warning, one hour per 2.5 cm and 1 cm stop line are rules of thumb. For bulk pricing, GST invoicing, and MSDS and IFRA documentation on request, message us on WhatsApp at +91 7397976926.
Frequently asked questions
- My Candle Jar Holds 200 ml but Has a 7 cm Internal Diameter — Which Measurement Should I Use When Choosing the Wick?
- I'm Using the Same Amount of Wax in a Tall Narrow Jar and a Short Wide Jar — Why Do They Need Different Wick Sizes?
- My Candle Jar Is Wider at the Top Than the Bottom — How Does That Affect Burn Testing as the Candle Burns Down?
- I Have a Straight-Sided 3-Inch Candle Jar — How Do I Choose the First Three Wick Sizes to Test Rather Than Guessing Randomly?
- I Already Finalised My Wick for a 7 cm Jar — If My New Jar Is 8 cm Wide, Do I Have to Repeat the Entire Burn-Testing Process?
- My Candle Burns Perfectly in a Narrow Jar but Tunnels in My Wider Jar Using the Same Wick — What Should I Change First?
- My Jar Has a Thick Glass Base — Does That Affect How the Candle Burns Near the Bottom and Therefore My Wick Selection?
- My Double-Wick Candle Burns Too Hot Near the End of the Jar — Could the Container Shape Be Contributing to the Problem?
- I'm Switching Candle Jar Suppliers but the New Jar Looks Almost Identical — What Measurements Must Match Before I Keep the Same Wick?
- The Supplier Gives the External Diameter of the Candle Jar — Can I Use That for Wick Selection or Do I Need the Internal Diameter?
Customer reviews: The six reviews at the top of this page are genuine, published Judge.me reviews left by CSI customers on the product pages named on each card — Black Glass Jar with Black Lid (150 gram) (Deliveries Starting 5th Dec), Clear Glass Jar with Golden Lid (150 gram), Eco Candle Wicks, Eco Soy CSI 400, Woody Oud Fragrance Oil. They are general product reviews, not assessments of the container advice on this page. Names, star ratings, dates and products are as recorded by Judge.me and wording is unedited. "Verified buyer" appears only on reviews Judge.me recorded as verified — Soumili Gope, Biny Abraham, Monika Deep, Renam Dhoundiyal, Payal Patel, Arminder Kaur. Reviews below five stars are included as published, not filtered out.
Figures verified 26 September 2026, CSI live pricing: Clear Glass Jar with Golden Lid (150 gram) Pack of 10 ₹944.00, Pack of 20 ₹1,888.00 (₹94.40 per jar); coloured 150 g jars Pack of 10 ₹1,070.00, Pack of 20 ₹2,140.00 (₹107.00 per jar; Amber out of stock); Eco Candle Wicks Thin (C1) 10 ₹59.00, 20 ₹118.00, 50 ₹295.00, 100 ₹590.00, 500 ₹2,950.00, 1000 ₹5,900.00 (₹5.90 per wick); Thick (C2) 10 ₹94.40, 20 ₹188.80, 50 ₹472.00, 100 ₹944.00, 500 ₹4,720.00, 1000 ₹9,440.00 (₹9.44 per wick); Cotton Braided Wicks Ready Made 10 ₹120.00, 50 ₹600.00, 100 ₹1,200.00, 500 ₹6,000.00, 1000 ₹12,000.00 (₹12.00 per wick); Candle Wick Stickers 40 ₹100.00 (100-sticker sheet out of stock); Candle Making Weighing Scale ₹354.00; Luxury Soy Wax CSI 464 500 g ₹260.00, 1 kg ₹507.40, 10 kg ₹5,074.00; Woody Oud Fragrance Oil 15 g ₹93.22, 100 g ₹453.12, 1 kg ₹4,531.20 (₹4.53 per gram at 1 kg). Per unit = pack price ÷ units; two decimals.
Non-price figures: pool area = π × r² on inside diameters (8.0 cm 50.27, 7.0 cm 38.48, 6.25 cm 30.68, 6.3 cm 31.17, 5.8 cm 26.42 cm²); 1 g of water ≈ 1 cm³. The 8.0 → 6.0 cm jar is a worked example; the 150 g jar's inside figures assume 0.35 cm walls on its listed outer rim and base. Taper bands and checkpoint criteria are judgement; the pool-depth, first-burn, one-hour-per-2.5-cm and 1 cm stop-line figures are rules of thumb. Test candles are 150 g at 8% (12 g oil + 138 g wax). The 85°C figure is page wording. Diwali is a calendar date. Costs exclude labour, freight, packaging and GST.